Monday, May 5, 2008

George J Noakes, Part 8--College Life and Other Pursuits

To left:  The main administration building at Oregon State College, Corvallis, Oregon  (later Oregon State University), circa 1948, the year my dad entered as a freshman.

  It's a public land-grant school founded in 1869.  The chief rival of the more famous University of Oregon.  My dad had thought about going to the bigger school, located in Eugene, but he found that campus to have too much of a "country club" atmosphere he didn't much care for. Corvallis, smaller and less elitist,  suited him better 

Oregon State's chief  claim to international fame in academics is that it was the university-home of Doctor Linus Pauling, a double Nobel Prize Winner (for Chemistry and later for Peace.)   Currently, OSU holds the distinction  for having won the National  Collegiate Baseball World Series in 2006 and 2007.  For a relatively small university, it was a major accomplishment to beat such baseball powerhouses as USC, Texas, Stanford and Arizona State.

Like most cross-state rivals, the University of Oregon Ducks and Oregon State Beavers have long been sports rivals.  The annual football game between the Beaver squad and the Ducks (called by the media, apparently without irony, "The Civil War") is the biggest sporting event in a state which has no NFL football franchise.   

Though he only went there two years, dad was a keen follower of Beaver sports all the way through his life.   We went to some basketball games OSU had in Berkeley against the University of California Bears when I was growing up in the Bay Area.  HIs biggest passion though was baseball and I was glad that OSU managed to win those baseball titles before he left this world.  I found some clippings of the baseball college championships in one of his old yearbooks.

Anyway, in his own words:

"I enrolled at Oregon State College after two years in the Marines in September of 1948.  My major was business with  a minor in "forestry--business and technology".  I was told by my advisor I would be better off going forty miles down the road to the University of Oregon in Eugene, mainly because he wasn't too impressed with my math and science scores...but I didn't feel comfortable on the campus in Eugene, so I stayed put."

"My first year I had a girlfriend and was doing pretty well in my classes.  One of the things I did as far as extra-curricular stuff was become a student volunteer in the Presidential campaign between Harry Truman and Thomas Dewey, who was governor of New York.  Dewey had been a "racket buster" district attorney back in New York in the 1930's and was very popular.  Most of the magazines and newspapers picked him to be the next President. To me, he was a banker-type and a phony to boot, unlike Truman who made it up on his own bootstraps.  I remember seeing Dewey on a newsreel trying to milk a cow in Wisconsin or somewhere--the guy was milking this cow wearing a suit!    

"Among other things, I drove a truck with a loud speaker and a banner for the Democrats.  We worked hard at  getting out the vote for President Truman.  Oregon was a tough state for him to win,  because of all the conservative farmers who had started making big money in food exports to Europe and other places after the war. The farmers naturally jumped back to the Republicans from the Democrats now that the Great Depression was over.  Despite the fact that he was predicted to lose the race and all the white southerners went over to Strom Turmond over the segregation issue and some progressives went to Henry Wallace(ex-FDR vice-president 1941-45) , Truman won."

That he did, to my father's surprise and delight.  Truman engineered his famous come from behind victory by hitting hard at (i.e, "giving hell" to) the "do nothing 80th Congress" for its lackluster record and attempts to roll back elements of the New Deal.  Dewey turned out to be a lackluster campaigner who said little and went about spouting  platitudes like "the future is ahead of us", taking for granted the Democratic hold  on the White House was over. Although Truman was not a strong Civil Rights President, he was open enough about the changes in the racial divides in America to lose the Deep South in a rift within the Democratic Party that had been growing under Franklin Roosevelt's tenure. 

My dad for years maintained Truman had won Oregon voters as well as the national vote. His memory was actually a little faulty--years later when I looked up the 1948 vote and discovered that Oregon had actually voted for Dewey and awarded its electoral votes  to the Republican. He was a little crest-fallen at that update, but it mattered little because Oregon was the only Western state Truman didn't carry in November of 1948.    

  

Nominee Harry S. Truman Thomas E. Dewey Strom Thurmond
Party Democratic Republican Dixiecrat
Home state Missouri New York South Carolina
Running mate Alben W. Barkley Earl Warren Fielding L. Wright
Electoral vote 303 189 39
States carried 28 16 4
Popular vote 24,179,347 21,991,292 1,175,930
Percentage 49.6% 45.1% 2.4%
United States presidential election, 1948
from Wikipedia 

To continue my  dad's narrative: 

"The first year went by fast with no problems.  The GI Bill paid our room and tuition and we got so much a month for living expenses. It seemed funny because many of the other students around me were so young, just out of high school, and I had already seen so much and aged.    

(Here's' my dad, taken about the time of his return from college.)   "The next Summer (1949) I got a job driving a taxi cab in Portland.  It was different, to say the least.  Some riders made me nervous when they insisted they ride up in the passenger side of the taxi with me.  Drunks were my least favorite fare. I met a whole lot of people from all walks of life.

"Back to school in the Fall, I made a big mistake academically and otherwise: I enrolled in the Army ROTC program.  It required a lot of math and figuring coordinates and I was just not good at that type of thing. The regular courses became harder also and my grade point average suffered.  After the second year I resigned from the ROTC but it was too late.  I had to leave Oregon State.  I enrolled up at Vanport College (later Portland State).  I concentrated up there on business and accounting courses.  My grades started going back up. Before going to Vanport that (Summer 1950) I worked as a route manager for the Oregon Journal newspaper.   I hired all the carriers and supervised the delivery.  I got my first real experience in sales, selling newspaper contracts to dealers who carried the paper at sidewalk stands.   

"While at college,  I saved up  some extra money working graveyard at a plywood mill. In the Spring of 1951 I found I was just tired of school.  I bought myself a railroad ticket and took off for the East Coast.  When I got to Washington D.C., I found I liked the place.  I interviewed and got a job for the Washington Post in the circulation department. But I thought it over the night before I was going to start and decided to get back on the train again for the West Coast. When I got back to Portland, I took a job with the International Harvester  Company in the accounting department.   Conditions were very good.  Wish I could say the same for the pay."

Considering all the work and the Marine hitch and all, I think my  father was just restless and bored with school.  To me, he was lucky he did so badly in the ROTC; had he done well he would have stayed in and been on for the Korean War.  (The Army called after he was dropped for the course when war broke out.  They wanted him to enlist as a soldier; my dad later said he thought "if the Marines couldn't kill me in two years, why give the Army a second chance?")   I'm not sure why he even went in to ROTC program at Oregon State at all, but he did once tell me that if I was drafted  into the military he hoped I could stay in school as long as I could so I could go in as an officer.  The idea of me as an officer in anything but the Salvation Army is, frankly, laughable but my dad's experiences were his own and some things can't be answered unless you are with that person and in that environment. 

The other big "what-if" was what would have happened to my dad if he had stayed on the East Coast.  I know Washington's atmosphere must have been heady stuff for him.  (Portland was not a big city  back then; it was really a large town.)  Next to sports, politics  was a major passion of his, and most of his reading of biographies and history was of a political nature.     

So it's 1951-2 in this life-story and my dad is fully grown and on his own with a decent job and a car and a hankering for romance and all that.   The next part of the story I will tell about his finding his real calling and his true love in life.    

17 comments:

  1. very engaging reading, Doug. I like how you throw in some background info along the way. Truman beat Dewey soundly in that election. It really wasn't even close. I saw an old clip of Dewey and I didn't care for him, either.

    ReplyDelete
  2. That was really interesting. Its a world away from NZ in the same era I think. Like Frank, I too like the way you add to and background your father's story.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I found this clip of future Republican, Ronald Reagan, endorsing Harry Truman back in 1948. What's amazing about this is that its a good speech(!) --the rhetoric Reagan uses is very much how he rode to the Presidency: plenty of statistics and human interest stories. It's a classic Reagan spiel, only for the benefit of the average Joe or Jane and against big companies like Standard Oil. (Reagan going on a verbal snit about oil companies jacking up prices for profits??? It's like another guy altogether.)
    He even endorses the uber-Democrat Hubert Humphrey, then Mayor of Minneapolis! ( I think Reagan's politics changed sharply either because of his second marriage to Nancy Reagan and her reactionary-racist step-father, Doctor Loyal Davis, and/or his work as a spokesman for the General Electric Company.)


    object width="425" height="355">

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks for your encouraging words. My dad always kept up with political events so a lot of what he talked about from that era was political. Dewey comes off as a smug, icy guy to me in the clips I've looked at.
    The GOP took no chances the next time out and went with a war hero, Eisenhower, on the top of the ticket.
    Wish I could have found the clip of Dewey milking a cow in some newsreel.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I think is was General Electric (he was bought out.) His primary motivation, in my opinion, was the high tax rates....Once I heard a speech he gave in the early 60s, after his conversion, and he talked about the high income tax rates...

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thank you, Iri Ani. I hope politics in New Zealand avoided anything akin to the "Red Scare" era that hounded many Americans out of work or into jail if they didn't cooperate with the FBI or Congressional committees. No one in entertainment, the media or academia could hold a job unless they signed a loyalty oath. King Henry VIII would have approved of that I suppose ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  7. I think you're right on that one.

    ReplyDelete
  8. It is very intersting following your fathers exploits bd (before Doug). I will have to see if I can get the same kind of information from my parents.

    ReplyDelete
  9. "b.d." you say? I like that. Yes, I think, especially when you have kids, you should find out as much as your parents want to say about their lives before they became parents.

    ReplyDelete
  10. This is great stuff Doug, your Dad is a very interesting person, his 'primary source' material is so well written as a matter of fact this episode crosses over with my own neonatal existence but I wasn't as engaged in US politics when I was first born as I am now, so this is fascinating stuff that is really helping me catch up with some of that.
    It's all like a great big historical tapestry of a time that gave rise to present epoch enter the 50s, the Beat generation, rock 'n' roll, jet planes and the post-war boom. Because of your Dad's writings you are able to put together your own Heimatt, a longitudinal study of your family over time, it's good reading, I'm looking forward to the next installment.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Thanks AA. I think 1948 was one of the most interesting years of the 20th Century for political and social events. (Truman's improbable victory, the end of the Palestinian Mandate for Great Britian, the Berlin Airlift, the London Olympics, the rifts over social programs in the Attlee Cabinet, civil war in Greece, China, and near civil war in Italy and on and on.) I'd like to read your takes on that period and your family sometime.

    I wish I had more material on my fraternal and maternal grandparents, then I could try and approach in minuture that "Heimatt" you speak of. One of my favorite novels is John Steinbeck's "East of Eden"(1952), where he took one family over time and weaved together a fascinating multi-decade story of the Trasks and the Hamiltons in a farming/agricultural town--Salinas, California. Steinbeck created a novel that rang so true the good "city fathers" of modern Salinas in the fifties had a fit over his honesty about the vice and avarice that was part of northern California's frontier past.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I agree Doug 1948 was a very interesting year, it was the year Orwell inverted to become 1984 it was also the year that Britain's National Health Service began (on 5 July) and also when the RAND Corporation became an autonomous think tank for the US armed forces (i.e. the birth of Infowar).

    I too love Steinbeck and was in Salinas for his Centenary in 2002, although I was less taken with the town itself which I thought was a bit edgy and felt slightly menacing at times.
    On the subject of novels about families over time, one of my favourites is 'One Hundred Years of Solitude' by Gabriel Garcia Marquez which I think is an amazing study of life, death and evolution of a town from it's inception to war and degradation. Very much 'new world' themes I think, like Steinbeck's.....I especially love 'Tortilla Flat' and it's revelations about the nutritional value of beans.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Whoops...sorry AA I accidently deleted your previous comment when I tried to put together a reply. Totally my unintentional fault I assure you.

    ReplyDelete
  14. To answer your acciddently missing missive--Yes, how could I forget that George Orwell brought forth "1984" in that year...also the same year that the National Security Act went forward (Rand Corporation) and a lot of ugliness in the name of fighting Communism sallied forth.

    I haven't read "100 Years of Solitude" yet...didn't finish it in college...nothing wrong with the book, just loaned it out to a pal or had a bad attack of ADD or some lame excuse like that.

    1948 was also the year that Jack Kerouac, that "the Wizard of Ozone Park", started work on "On the Road".


    Here in America we;re still fighting for comprehensive health insurance, not as a perk of work or career but as a basic human need. Truman introduced such a scheme buut he was blocked by the GOP Congress and the notion that it was "socialized medicine". We may get there someday to something approaching NHS. Whatever flaws it has or its Canadian counterpart, it would be a better deal than the Wild West health care the USA has today.

    Salinas an "edgy,sinister" place? I'll bet Steinbeck would have enjoyed that description. They love him down there now that he's a Nobel Prize Winner and he's dead. He was a prophet without honor there for much of his writing career.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I didn't say I thought it was 'sinister' Doug that would be going too far I think lol. But I did say 'a bit edgy and slightly threatening' by that I meant groups of males kind of hanging round whom I did not experience as exuding the milk of human kindness. This could be a cultural clash of cognitions, maybe they were only waiting to help old ladies across the road and I read it all wrong?
    It was just the vibe I got there,maybe they thought I was Booby McGhee who'd eternally 'slipped away' from Janis in that locality and they didn't approve..... who knows?....anyway I survived

    ReplyDelete
  16. Trust your instincts in that area; I'm sorry to say I rather doubt you were wrong about certain of my fellow male Californians in that area.
    I have gone down to that Santa Cruz/Salinas/Monterey area a few times myself when I lived in the Bay Area proper. I got the distinct feeling--from the "GO HOME! " graffhiti along certain backroads and some sullen looks my friends and I got --that some locals weren't too happy with anyone who looked like a traveler looking for local color. Some folks like the small town feel of their environment and don't want change, even if it comes in peace and brings cash to spend.

    Good shot of yourself and the man in question by the way. Wish I'd been there that time myself. This reminds me to check out Salinas next time I'm down that way, near my old haunts in San Jose.

    ReplyDelete