Thursday, April 10, 2008

Richard Nixon, The Early Smears

 

 

Richard Nixon began his political career after he was discharged from the US Navy in 1946.  He impressed a group of small businessmen, farmers, fruit orchard owners and sundry other Republican contributors--called The Committee of 100--to run as a GOP stalwart against a five-term Democrat, Jerry Voorhis.   

Few expected him to win, even among his backers, and Nixon at first received very few contributions for his efforts. Voorhis himself didn't take Nixon seriously, according to Stephen Ambrose in his 1987 book "Nixon: The Education of a Politican".  The incumbent spent much of the campaign in Washington, solidifying his image as a hard-working legislator.  

That was a huge mistake by Voorhis.  "Tricky Dick"--as Nixon  came to be known in a later campaign--was not one to be underestimated.  He began to smear Voorhies as a Communist sympathsizer.  He did it by trying to tie Voorhies to the CIO Labor Union, which did have some Communists among their ranks.  The problem was the CIO hadn't endorsed Congressman Voorhis.   Only one small local branch of a local CIO had issued a recommendation on a mimeopgraphed sheet of paper for its rank-and-file to vote for Voorhis.  Nixon and his team took this small handbill paper endorsemdent by one small segment of the CIO and turned it into a big lie that the whole union, and especially the Communist elements, had endorsed the Democrat. 

That same year,the  Communist Party newspaper "People's World", had denounced Voorhis as "against unity with Communists under any circumstances".  In truth, the incumbent was simply a liberal/progressive type, a mainstream New Deal Democrat friendly with working-class interests.  He had even introduced a bill in the the House of Representitives in 1940 calling for all Communists to register with the national government!

Meanwhile, in the state of Wisconsin, another Republican was having similar success in wresting a Senate seat from Robert LaFollette, Jr..  The candidate's name--Joseph McCarthy.     

To quote StephenAmbrose (Nixon, Volume I, 1987, page, 129)

 "...both Voorhis and (Senator) Robert LaFollette, Jr had become anathema to the Communist Party, because they  had denounced Russian aggression in Eastern Europe. But the truth mattered not one bit to either Joe McCarthy or Nixon."  

This  was 1946 and FDR was dead and the war was over and the GOP was desperate and the country was used to stories of spies and cloak and dagger espionage generated by radio shows and Hollywood films. If the Nazis wren't a threat anymore, go to the next best thing.  A new villiany must  be found. And it wasn't like Russia's interests in Eastern Europe were exactly in accord with the other former Allies.  

  By the time Voorhis got back to his district, he was under attack from every right-of-center newspaper in Orange County and Pasadena with ads placed by the Nixon campaign and the Committee of 100.  He also performed poorly in four debates against the young challenger.  Nixon was a formidible debater and kept Voorhis on the defensive with the outlandish CIO endorsement claim.  Voorhis responded with long ponderous appeals; Nixon just shot back with more headline grabbing attacks--"The Los Angeles Times", the paper run by arch-conservative, anti-union Owen Chandler, endorsed Nixon and no doubt kept the headlines a'grabbing.   Nixon won the election and continued his tactics for most of his career, first getting an important seat on the House Un-American Activities Committee.  He can be glimpsed below briefly near the beginning of a documentary on the HUAC witchhunts that started in Hollywood in October, 1947.  

One can't help wondering if the history of the USA would have been different if Nixon's earliest opponent had taken him as a serious contender.  Nixon did get his comeuppance with the Watergate imbloglio--but not after almost thirty years as a major force on the national and world stage.

16 comments:

  1. I am not sure it would have changed a lot. If you look at the trial and tribulations of Abe Lincoln you can see all he failures early on and yet he became one of the best Presidents the US has seen. Thank you for doing the leg work on Nixon.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Having been something of a "Nixon Era" kid growing up, I've always had a fascination with this guy. And, yes, its "tricky" to try and figure what would have happened to the country if Nixon had burned out in 1946 or 1952 (when he was nearly pushed off the ticket for Vice-President by Eisenhower and saved himself with the maudlin "Checkers Speech"). Maybe somehow things would have been worse. It's a question without a possible answer.

    ReplyDelete
  3. You are absolutley right about that my friend

    ReplyDelete
  4. Man, Gary Cooper came off as a spineless fool in that clip. Bogart, though, stood up to those idiots.

    "In truth, the incumbent was simply a liberal/progressive type, a mainstream New Deal Democrat friendly with working-class interests." The republicans tried to smear all liberals like this at time. LaFollette was one of the best senators of the period, and to be pushed over for McCarthy only shows how ignorant the voting public could and can still be.

    If it wasn't Nixon, it would have been somebody else. Though he did excel at dirty politics, which in the end did him in both politically and personally.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Did you know Major John Nixon was the dude that read the Declaration of Independence to the good people in Philadelphia on July 4th 1776?

    It was destiny.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Dirty politics seem to have been around in the US for a long time then. All I really remember about Nixon was Watergate so I found this very interesting, thanks Doug.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Spineless fool is a generous term . You wouldn't know it from that clip that Gary Cooper's father had been a court judge in Montana and that young Gary had been educated in British boarding schools. Here he plays on his "Sergeant York/John Doe" persona to the crowd and the Committee.

    Cooper some years later did try to help Carl Foreman, the screenwriter for "High Noon" (1952), from being blacklisted and forced out of Hollywood. I guess his conscience kicked in, but of course it was too late for anybody, no matter what their status, to stop the fearmongering.

    ReplyDelete
  8. If much of what you know about Nixon concerns Watergate, then you know all you need to know about the guy to get a grasp of his character. Our 37th President had been heading for that "train wreck' all his public life.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Interesting bit of historical color! If Richard Nixon himself had been around during 1776, he probably would have put Thomas Jefferson on one of his "enemies lists" and sworn allegence to the Tories.

    ReplyDelete
  10. You can see why the Soviet Union was demonised at that time with it's history of repression, witch hunts and show trials....no hang on a minute, but............

    ReplyDelete
  11. There is something unsettling bout how the HUAC Committee and Senator McCarthy's tactics imitated the show trails and climate of fear Stalin brought about in the 1930's.
    The results were not as lethal or brutal as Russia's "Great Terror", but this American version did deny thousands of people the right to work, drove some to despair and suicide, and put many law-biding citizens and war vets in jail for non-cooperation with Congresssional Committees.
    Lillian Hellman, one of those prominent blacklisted writers, called this period "Scoundrel Time" in one of her memoirs. And a time of scoundrels it was.

    ReplyDelete
  12. It is amazing how the threat of communism and being a member still has its effect today. Remember back to the Dukakis/ Bush election. He was leading the polls by double digit margins until the 1st Bush started on him for being a "card carrying" member of the ACLU. The term card carrying was incorrectly related back to communism.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I used to be a card carrying communist before we all mutated, now I'm a card carrying Earthling

    ReplyDelete
  14. I have a library card does that make me a card carrier?

    ReplyDelete
  15. No it makes you an intellectual....so watch out they traditionally come for them next

    ReplyDelete
  16. Keep that a secret would you please! I don't want to blow my idiot cover

    ReplyDelete