Showing posts with label cslewis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cslewis. Show all posts

Thursday, September 9, 2010

C.S. Lewis: The "Mere Christian", Soldier, Scholar, Communicator, and "Narnian"

He was a teacher who said he hated teaching.  A dedicated Shavian atheist at adolescence and a young adult  who came at age 31 to accept that "God was God" and became in his words, "the most reluctant convert in all England" one night in 1929 while kneeling all alone on a quiet night in his rooms at his college.   And an cloistered intellectual and homebody who disliked traveling abroad, yet graced the cover of "Time Magazine" and continues long after his passing to reach millions all over the world. 

Two years later he took a memorable walk with his friends and came closer than ever to accepting  the  Christian faith.  Little could he have known that night along "Addison's Walk" in Oxford that he would become world famous in his own lifetime as an "apostle to the skeptics" and his life the subject of many books, documentaries, film dramatizations and articles. While Lewis scholarship in the field of literature is significant--he wrote an entire volume of the Oxford Dictionary of English Literature for the 16th Century (sans poetry) over a twenty-year period and taught at Oxford and Cambridge for most of his life, his greatest gift to the world was in reaching out to believers and want-to be believers through stories, critical essays, books for all ages and endless articles and personal  correspondence with people he mostly never met who had been touched in some way by at least one of his works.   

"The heart of Christianity is a myth which is also a fact. The old myth of the Dying God, without ceasing to be myth, comes down from the heaven of legend and imagination to the earth of history. It happens — at a particular date, in a particular place, followed by definable historical consequences. We pass from a Balder or an Osiris, dying nobody knows when or where, to a historical Person crucified (it is all in order) under Pontius Pilate. By becoming fact it does not cease to be myth: that is the miracle."--Lewis, from his Collection of essays" "God in the Dock"  

C.S. "Jack" Lewis (1898-1963), born in Belfast to a Ulster Protestant family,   is best known today for his seven part  'Narnia' series, written when he was in his fifties and already established not only as an Oxford University don at Madgelan College, but also as a writer of Christian apologetics in works such as "Miracles", "The Problem of Pain" and the most famous of his mature works, "Mere Christianity".  The latter work was drawn from a series of radio lectures Lewis was asked to give on the BBC early in World War II by the Director of Religious Broadcasting.  A brief overview of Lewis central thesis in the talks concerned that a proof of the existence of God came from what he called "The Tao" (The Way) , a set of ethics known in common to all religions and even the non-religious also as The Moral Law. It is a law that stands above nature and gives humans an innate sense of right and wrong and how they wish to be treated.  And, just as humankind might yearn for food and water or other desires, and there is food and water to fulfill this need, so must there be a God to which the embodiment of this yearning exists to fulfill our inner selves. 


In the forties Lewis debated atheists and believers in the evenings once a week at The  Socratic Club.  He was a formidable debater, but  not a smug one. He once warned a group of Welsh clergyman in a speech: 

'No doctrine of the Faith seems to me so spectral, so unreal as one I have just successfully  defended in a public debate. .. it has seemed to rest on itself; as a result, when you go away from that  debate it seems no stronger than its weakest pillar. That is why we apologists take our lives in our hands , and can be saved  only from by falling back continually from the web of our own arguments from Christian apologetics  into Christ Himself."  


Lewis himself was a man  on guard against the trapping of ego.  Despite his vast learning and reputation, he sought to remind himself and others that faith is more or less a longing, a yearning for a better place and how its effects are replicated in our conduct of "the shadowlands" of this life.  


   The Narnia stories are  books for children that brought in elements of Christian allegory with other more ancient views of supernatural powers of good and evil as well as the nature-gods of various pagan religions of the past.  A good friend of Professor Lewis for much of his life was J. R.R. Tolkein, creator of the Middle Earth novels of which "The Lord of the Rings" trilogy is most famous. Tolkein, a strict Catholic, didn't like the way Lewis mixed all types of pagan and popular imagery together in these stories, but for Lewis I suspect it  was  all to the good to bring as much of his fertile imagination and love of fantasy together to create a world that held all enduring myths in some mode of sacred power.  
  
Both these men met at Oxford University in the 1920's with Lewis as a tutor of Medieval and Renaissance Literature and Tolkein as a young professor of Old English.  Both men had served on the Western Front during what was then called the Great War and seen many of their friends lost in its terrible wake of blood, explosions, muddy trenches and flying steel. These meetings with one another grew as friends and fellow writers gathered to hear first drafts of their works in a group that came to be called "The Inklings" in the 1930's.   It was on these Thursday evenings and in other gatherings at the "Eagle and Child" pub in Oxford that Lewis felt most at home, sitting with other writers and keen thinkers discussing a myriad of topics around a fire, relaxed and in good company.  Little wonder that he once described to his American publisher that "he was most happy hearing the could of male laughter". 

Friendship is unnecessary, like philosophy, like art... It has no survival value; rather it is one of those things that give value to survival. 
C. S. Lewis 

    
 Another irony of Lewis life was that he was a long-time  bachelor, living with his older brother Warren "Warnie" Lewis, a retired army officer and an older woman named Mrs. Moore, the mother of a close friend  who he had pledged to look after to a friend who did not return from the trenches of 1918.  After Mrs. Moore died, he came to marry an American woman named Joy Davidman who had come to England in part to meet him.  She too was a former atheist and writer.   When she came down with cancer in the mid-fifties Lewis married her so she would not have to worry about overstaying her visa.   After a seeming miracle recovery from the cancer, Lewis and Davidman and her two male children moved in together at "The Kilns", the small house he and his brother shared on a few acres near Oxford. (By this time Lewis was spending his weekdays at Cambridge, where he had been granted a full professorship.)

After just a few years together the cancer returned in  1960, and Joy soon died.  The blow from this loss hit Lewis like a thunderbolt.  Amazingly, and in the true fashion of a writer, he recorded his mental torments and anger with God in perhaps his most harrowing  book, "A Grief Observed".     

Lewis faith in God was shaken but recovered in his later works and he continued to write more essays and letters in his brief retirement right up to the last few days of his life. He died on November 22, 1963, the same day as the death of Aldous Huxley and the assassination of John F. Kennedy.

Here is a clip from "The Question of  God: Sigmund Freud and CS Lewis" a PBS documentary. Much of Lewis' words in this documentary are taken from the  spiritual memoir of his early life,  "Surprised By Joy".



Wednesday, February 4, 2009

"The Language of God"

Rating:★★★★
Category:Books
Genre: Science
Author:Francis Collins
"The Language of God" is a 2007 book that makes a compelling case for a person in the higher echelons of the hard sciences having faith in God, as well as respecting the theory of evolution that agnostics Charles Darwin and Thomas Henry Huxley proposed in the 1860's.


To many Evolution as a theory is an attack on religion; to Dr. Collins more supple mind it is "the language of God". Collins, one of the scientific leaders of the Human Genome Project, also skewers the counter-arguments of the Young Earth Creationists takes a strong case for what he calls "Theistic Evolution"--a system that might be described as "intelligent design" for grown ups..

The book also suggests a truce over the pointless and seemingly endless debate in America over science and faith. As he writes in his summary chapter, "Biologos":

"Will we turn our backs on science because it is perceived as a threat to God, abandoning all of the promise of advancing our understanding of nature and applying the alleviation of suffering and the betterment of mankind? Alternatively, will we turn our backs on faith, concluding that science has rendered the spiritual life no longer necessary, and that traditional religious symbols can now be replaced by the engraving of the double helix on our altars?

"Both of these choices are profoundly dangerous. Both deny truth. Both will diminish the nobility of humankind...And both are unnessesary. The God of the Bible is also the God of the genome. He can be worshipped in a cathedral or in a laboratory."

And he offers strong rebuttal to the smug atheism of "The God Delusion" author Richard Dawkins. This book might not make a believer out of you, but it will give you enough information about all sides of the argument and I think you can't help coming away from even a cursory reading believing that faith is God is not the "woo-woo" wishful thinking some pundits would like many to imagine.

Collins draws a lot of his faith from his personal experiences as a medical doctor. He does not come from a Christian background, so he doesn't write this just because he is trying to straddle some family obligations; he gained his faith in his twenties working with patients as a medical doctor, especially those dealing with death. He found that many of them had a sense of calm and poise that surprised him. One day an older lady facing the end asked him, "Do you believe in God." Collins, then an atheist, suddenly realized that his mind was in flux on the important matter.

After much soul-searching, he decided to do unusual for him up to that point. He visited a church. A pastor he talked to about his gnawing doubts about his original view of the Cosmos recommended he read C.S. Lewis "Mere Christianity". The results of his study of Lewis' book and The Bible opened new avenues of looking at the laws of the universe for Dr. Collins.

Here's an interview with Collins, taken from a video produced by the Faraday Institute at St Edmunds College, Cambridge.


Monday, July 21, 2008

The Problem of Pain

Rating:★★★★★
Category:Books
Genre: Religion & Spirituality
Author:C.S. Lewis 1940, Reprinted 2001
Seeing the human follies of war, greed and over exploitation of finite global resources, one book has been on my mind lately. I ask your indulgence to revise a review I wrote for "The Problem of Pain" last year on "Yahoo 360" now that its contents--edited a bit--seem more relevant. Lewis, better known as the creator of "The Narnia Chronicles", was a superb and concise prose writer, and a true "apostle to the skeptics" and this is one of his best works.

Critics of Christianity have had their field days going off on how a loving Deity could create a world where such things as pain and suffering exist. " The rain falls on the just and the unjust alike," Jesus pointed out, but what of the people who suffer from pain for no good reason such as genetic illness or being in the pathway of an evil person who wanted to rob or hurt someone?

There is also the question of hell. (Or Hell, don't know if I should capitalize the first letter of that place or not.) Some leaders in the church don't accept the idea that there is a place like hell. Given the popular conceptions of "everlasting fire" and what Dante's first volume of "The Divine Comedy " did for fleshing out the images he associated with the Underworld, and the graphic torments his enemies suffered, I can hardly blame any cleric for not playing that up at the Sunday Morning sermon.

Other Christians fully embrace the concept of Hell, but feel the place will be reserved for folks whose political and social mores do not match their own. Some are so certain about it they put bumper stickers on their vehicles saying "Eternal Life: Smoking or Non-Smoking" or "Those Who Live Like There's No Hell Better Be Right". That seems too smug to me--are such people casually condemning others to the "outer darkness" just because they are riding their car's bumper? The smuggest bumper sticker I've seen is the one that says "In Case of The Rapture, This Vehicle Will Be Unoccupied". Hmmm. Are these people talking to the Angels or do they think their presumed high status within a particular church congregation will give them a "All-Access" ticket if the world comes to an end?

To me, it's one thing to have faith, "the substance of the thing hoped for, the evidence of things not seen" (Hebrews 11:1). It's quite another to figure you got a pass, or , even if you are somehow certain of it, that you should brag about it. Christianity has its many critics and some of them are so because we forget that pride of place is something Jesus refused to give even to his own disciples, as the special request of the brothers James and John to Jesus illustrates (Mark 10:35-40).

One of the best and most direct discussions of why injustice and pain exists in the world came from the great lay Christian apologist, C.S. Lewis, in the book "The Problem of Pain" (1940, reprinted 2001 by Harper Collins Books). It is only one of many books about Faith that Professor Lewis wrote about, and it is to me the most challenging.




"On the one hand, if God is wiser than we His judgment must differ from ours on many things, and not least on good and evil. What seems to us good may therefore not be good in His eyes, and what seems to us evil may not be evil. On the other hand, if God's moral judgment differs from ours so that our `black' may be His `white', we can mean nothing by calling Him good".

--C S Lewis, from "The Problem of Pain"

Christianity presumes a loving Creator-God. To Lewis, such a God must be willing to grant humans free will. This is fraught with the potential for great love and great abuse. Lewis takes Augustine's notion of the Fall of Man seriously, but he puts it in a context that includes an Evolutionary path. (Lewis is no fundamentalist, although many of that ilk might like to pretend so because of his popularity from The Narnia Chronicles.)

Our "primitive" ancestors may have been less "brutish" than we imagine. Some of them might have been nobler than most of the people walking around today, Lewis surmises. But at some point thousands of years back a few humans--perhaps in an early town-dwelling period--began to set aside honoring God and preferred instead to have their own personal stash of good things that belonged not to a Creator but to themselves. This is The Fall to Lewis, and whether it involved a piece of fruit from a Tree of Knowledge or just something that rightfully belonged to another person or tribe of people is of no matter. Mankind had fallen. The endless repetition of this thievery on through today, for ill-gotten gain large and small, is just a reenactment of what some Christians see as Original Sin.

Not all pain comes from our neighbors. Pain also exists because of nature. The victims of myriad natural disasters for instance. If God intervened and provide miracle upon miracle to avert any human pain, it might be more pleasant but it would not be Life as we know it. He could also intervene constantly to stop the mistakes and follies of humankind that also result in mass pain. But would that be Life either? And is the hand of God in the present and the past staying disasters from nature or human judgement that we do not realize through our senses? This is the core matter of "theodicy" ("Why God allows evil.") It is the dark glass St. Paul said we are forced for now to see through.

Lewis goes on here to explain that the "good" most mortals understand is not so much completely different from that of Our Creator; we understand good, but our actions are often simply not "good" enough. We override our consciences to get what we want, even if the action is plain selfish and we rationalize the wrong somehow.

What we might accept as simply an expedient act, "getting some of our own back" from someone, is plain bad. That people will often look back and regret an action that hurt others shows that our concept of "good" is within us.

Our understanding can be insufficient in the way, the author points out, that a child's first attempts to draw a circle or a wheel on a piece of paper is not very close at all to a wheel as adults could fashion.

It's that humans often only want "kindness" from God, not love. ("Many want a grandfather in Heaven, not a Father" he writes. "Someone who doesn't care what is happening on Earth as long as 'a good time is being had by all'." ) There are consequences for our bad choices.

In this world, or course, a loving parent cannot always be "kind" to a child, for instance. There has to be times of discipline with the fun and indulgence. It's not because the parent doesn't love the child but because the parent is not indifferent to the future development of said child. There is no hint in his writing that restraint and discipline should take the form of corporal punishment, either. That presumably is left to the parent.

The need for hell, as mentioned by Jesus among others in the Gospels, of course has to be addressed. To Lewis, the netherworld is there to punish those people who have chosen to live lives devoted to self. It is not because God has ceased to Love an unrepentant criminal or a immoral person; it is because greedy and violent people must see how far they have fallen from grace. "To forgive is not the same thing as to condone," he writes.

Punishment exists both here and beyond. And shame and guilt are not always something to be expunged by a psychiatrist or a regimen of pills, but can be a chance for one being to feel the pain one has caused another and repent. It is this pain (which Lewis calls "God's megaphone") that sane people experience for past wrong actions.

Before I leave this off I want to make something clear: Mr. Lewis nowhere says that all human suffering is somehow just or delivered from God. All those who suffer from persecution in places like Darfur are, in my mind, suffering the way innocent early Christians suffered and I believe Lewis would acknowledge this. But it is POSSIBLE that some bouts of suffering can have a restorative effect on an individual.

Many people do not come to God until they feel a malady or suffer a personal reverse. When the illness lifts, however, they can be the better for having gone through a bleak period. And it is indeed a loving God who will wait patiently, as he did in my personal life, for some sadness or pain to crop up before I would deign to-- finally!-- acknowledge His gifts to me.

If you'd like to get Professor Lewis' ideas from "the horse's mouth" (and I can do little justice to his reflections here) then picking up a copy of "The Problem of Pain" is a good place to start. (All Lewis major works have been recently reissued.) I don't think one needs to be a committed Christian to gain something from this writings. You will likely come away with a clearer understanding of spiritual matters, and where that takes you might be a pleasant surprise as it was for this blogger.





See link below for more on C.S. Lewis and this book:

http://www.catholiceducation.org/articles/apologetics/ap0032.html


Sunday, August 19, 2007

C.S. Lewis /"The Problem of Pain", Part Two

"On the one hand, if God is wiser than we His judgment must differ from ours on many things, and not least on good and evil. What seems to us good may therefore not be good in His eyes, and what seems to us evil may not be evil. On the other hand, if God's moral judgment differs from ours so that our `black' may be His `white', we can mean nothing by calling Him good".

--C S Lewis, from "The Problem of Pain"

Christainty presumes a loving Creator-God. To Lewis, such a God must be willing to grant humans free will. This is fraught with the potential for great love and great abuse. Lewis takes Augustine's notion of the Fall of Man seriously, but he puts it in a context that includes an Evolutionary path. (Lewis is no fundmentalist, although many of that ilk might like to pretend so because of his popularity from The Narnia Chronicles.)

Our "primative" ancestors may have been less "brutish" than we imagine. Some of them might have been nobler than most of the people walking around today, Lewis surmises. But at some point thousands of years back a few humans--perhaps in an early town-dwelling period--began to set aside honoring God and prefered instead to have their own personal stash of good things that belonged not to a Creator but to themselves. This is The Fall to Lewis, and whether it involved a piece of fruit from a Tree of Knowledge or just something that rightfully belonged to another person or tribe of people is of no matter. Mankind had fallen. The endless repitition of this theivery on through today, for ill-gotten gain large and small, is just a reinactment of what some Christians see as Original Sin.

Not all pain comes from our neighbors. Pain also exists because of nature. The victims of myriad natural diasters for instance. If God intervened and provide miracle upon miracle to avert any human pain, it might be more pleasant but it would not be Life as we know it. He could also intervene constantly to stop the mistakes and follies of humankind that also result in mass pain. But would that be Life either?

Lewis goes on here to explain that the "good" most mortals understand is not so much completely different from that of Our Creator; we understand good, but our actions are often simply not "good" enough. We override our consciences to get what we want, even if the action is plain selfish and we rationalize the wrong somehow.

What we might accept as simply an expedient act, "getting some of our own back" from someone, is plain bad. That people will often look back and regret an action that hurt others shows that our concept of "good" is within us.

Our understanding can be insufficient in the way, the author points out, that a child's first attempts to draw a circle or a wheel on a piece of paper is not very close at all to a wheel as adults could fashion.

It's that humans often only want "kindness" from God, not love. ("Many want a grandfather in Heaven, not a Father" he writes. "Someone who doesn't care what is happening on Earth as long as 'a good time is being had by all'." ) There are consequences for our bad choices.

In this world, or course, a loving parent cannot always be "kind" to a child, for instance. There has to be times of disapline with the fun and indulgence. It's not because the parent doesn't love the child but because the parent is not indifferent to the future development of said child. There is no hint in his writing that restaint and disapline should take the form of corporal punishment, either. That presumably is left to the parent.

The need for hell, as mentioned by Jesus among others in the Gospels, of course has to be adressed. To Lewis, the netherworld is there to punish those people who have chosen to live lives devoted to self. It is not because God has ceased to Love an unrepentant criminal or a immoral person; it is because greedy and violent people must see how far they have fallen from grace. "To forgive is not the same thing as to condone," he writes.

Punishment exists both here and beyond. And shame and guilt are not always something to be expunged by a psychiatrist or a regimen of pills, but can be a chance for one being to feel the pain one has caused another and repent. It is this pain (which Lewis calls "God's megaphone") that sane people experience for past wrong actions.

Before I leave this off I want to make something clear: Mr. Lewis nowhere says that all human suffering is somehow just or delivered from God. All those who suffer from persecution in places like Darfur are, in my mind, suffering the way innocent early Christians suffered and I believe Lewis would acknowledge this. But it is POSSIBLE that some bouts of suffering can have a restorative effect on an individual.

Many people do not come to God until they feel a malady or suffer a personal reverse. When the illness lifts, however, they can be the better for having gone through a bleak period. And it is indeed a loving God who will wait patiently, as he did in my personal life, for some sadness or pain to crop up before I would deign to-- finally!-- acknowledge His gifts to me.

If you'd like to get Professor Lewis' ideas from "the horse's mouth" (and I can do little justice to his reflections here) then picking up a copy of "The Problem of Pain" is a good place to start. (All Lewis major works have been recently reissued.) I don't think one needs to be a committed Christian to gain something from this thoughts. You will definately come away with a clearer understanding of spiritual matters, and where that takes you might be a pleasant surprise as it was for this blogger.

Saturday, August 18, 2007

CS Lewis and The Problem of Pain

Critics of Christianity have had their field days going off on how a loving Deity could create a world where such things as pain and suffering exist. " The rain falls on the just and the unjust alike," Jesus pointed out, but what of the people who suffer from pain for no good reason such as genetic illness or being in the pathway of an evil person who wanted to rob or hurt someone?

There is also the question of hell. (Or Hell, don't know if I should capitalize the first letter of that place or not.) Some leaders in the church don't accept the idea that there is a place like hell. Given the popular conceptions of "everlasting fire" and what Dante's first volume of "The Divine Comedy " did for fleshing out the images he associated with the Underworld, and the graphic torments his enemies suffered, I can hardly blame any cleric for not playing that up at the Sunday Morning sermon.

Other Christians fully embrace the concept of Hell, but feel the place will be reserved for folks whose political and social mores do not match their own. Some are so certain about it they put bumper stickers on their vehicles saying "Eternal Life: Smoking or Non-Smoking" or "Those Who Live Like There's No Hell Better Be Right". That seems too smug to me--are such people casually condemning others to the "outer darkness" just because they are riding their car's bumper? The smuggest bumper sticker I've seen is the one that says "In Case of The Rapture, This Vehicle Will Be Unoccupied". Hmmm. Are these people talking to the Angels or do they think their presumed high status within a particular church congregation will give them a "All-Access" ticket if the world comes to an end.

To me, it's one thing to have faith, "the substance of the thing hoped for, the evidence of things not seen" (Hebrews 11:1). It's quite another to figure you got a pass, or , even if you are somehow certain of it, that you should brag about it. Christianity has its many critics and some of them are so because we forget that pride of place is something Jesus refused to give even to his own disciples, as the special request of the brothers James and John to Jesus illustrates (Mark 10:35-40).

One of the best and most direct discussions of why injustice and pain exists in the world came from the great lay Christian apologist, C.S. Lews, in the book "The Problem of Pain" (1940). It is only one of many books about Faith that Professor Lewis wrote about, and it maybe the most challenging It is an unflinching look at these criticisms I mentioned above and I will try to give some distillation of his arguments in my next entry.

In the meantime, I will include a link what I think is a good overview of the book. I recently have reen reading "The Problem of Pain" and my own interpetations will be briefer, and strictly based on my own limited understanding. So, if you're interested, you might as well start with a "pro" on an overview of Professor Lewis and his thoughts.

http://www.catholiceducation.org/articles/apologetics/ap0032.html