Showing posts with label britishempire. Show all posts
Showing posts with label britishempire. Show all posts

Sunday, July 29, 2012

Sir Winston Churchill - Funeral (I Vow To Thee, My Country)




"I Vow to Thee, My Country is a British patriotic song created in 1921 when a poem by Sir Cecil Spring-Rice was set to music by Gustav Holst."--Wikipedia

"I Vow to Thee" is one of those stirring traditional pieces that seems to summon up the natural rolling hills and fields of the English landscape by just listening to it.

Here it is combined with footage of the funeral of Great Britain's most famous statesman of the 20th Century.

When I was about six, my father bought me what was called a book "for young adults" on Churchill's life shortly after the old fellow had died. It emphasized Churchill's larger than life persona and the enourmous span of his career as a politician, writer, soldier, historian and wartime leader. I was of course taken by the theatricality of his coming to office at a dark moment in British and democratic history. I went back to this book from time to time and one might say it was the starting point of my interest and affection for the British nations.

There have so many versions of his life played out in books and film and television mini-series that one might be forgiven for not stepping back a bit and marvelling how one man, however flawed, made such a difference to the world at a crucial time and could later write so well about the times of his life and his nation.


Although I likely would never have voted for the guy, I have always felt a certain fondness for the resolution and durabiity of this man. So call this a chance to share one of my favorite hymms and recall London and the United Kingdom at a very different time of official pagentry.

Saturday, July 7, 2012

Eric Clapton and Company: "Cream" ("Sunshine of Your Love" and "Strange Brew" )

"Cream" was a rock-blues and psychedelic band that featured celebrated acoustic guitarist Eric Clapton (formerly of "The Blues Breakers" and "The Yard-birds"), drummer Ginger Baker and bassist Jack Bruce.  They were one the first "super-groups of the rock and roll era. 

Clapton, by the way, is the only performer in the Rock and Roll Fame of Fame to be inducted three separate times; for his tenure with "The Yard-birds", "Cream" and as a solo artist.  

 

The group's first major album was 1967's "Disraeli Gears".  It was recorded at Atlantic Records studios in New York City in May 1967 and released in November of that year.  It reached #5 in the British charts for top-selling albums and went to #4 in the USA .   Next to the release of The Beatles "Sgt. Pepper" album, it is probably the most influential rock album for that year.     Cream released only four albums but set the standard for the fusion of blues and psychedelic rock for years to come. Their work has sold an total of 70 million albums.

I had thought that the title of the album was poking a bit of fun at Victorian-era England and the confidence conservatives of that day had in industrialization. The truth is more prosaic and humorous:

"The title of the album is based on a malapropism. Eric Clapton had been thinking of buying a racing bicycle and was discussing it with Ginger Baker, when a roadie named Mick Turner commented, "it's got them Disraeli Gears", meaning to say "derailleur gears," but instead alluding to 19th-century British Prime Minister, Benjamin Disraeli. The band thought this was hilarious, and decided that it should be the title of their next album."--Wikipedia

  The iconic album cover was by an Australian artist named Mike Stanley.   

    This is the best live version of the second trac and biggest hit on this album, Sunshine of Your Love". I don't think it really gets much more "Sixties" in music than this!

Oh, and this song has covered a few times.  The Japanese band  Gastunk released a cover as a single in 1988;  the English sludge band  Fudge Tunnel recorded it, too.  (Anybody ever seen a "sludge band?)  Other groups and performers to cover the song include Jimi Hendrix, Elvis Costello and The Police, Spanky Wilson, Ozzy Osbourne, Carlos Santana and the most famous psychedelic rocker of all time........Trini Lopez!!!

        . 

Sunday, June 17, 2012

The Siege of Krishnapur (1973) A novel of the Indian Mutiiny

Rating:★★★★
Category:Books
Genre: Literature & Fiction
Author:J.G. Farrell
"Farrell introduces us gradually to a large cast of characters as he paints a vivid portrait of the Victorians' daily routines that are accompanied by heat, boredom, class-consciousness and the pursuit of genteel pastimes intended for cooler climates. Even the siege begins slowly, with disquieting news of massacres in cities far away..."
Alex Wilber, Amazon book reviews.


"the rim of darkness beneath the horizon began to sparkle like a firework and immediately the air about them began to sing and howl with flying metal and chips of masonry ... then in a wave came the sound. Daubs of orange hopped at regular intervals from one end of the darkness to the other. Suddenly, a shrapnel shell landed on the corner of the veranda and all was chaos."--Farrell, "Siege of Krishnapur."

J.G. Farrell's 1973 Booker prize winning novel is about a group of British colonial officials, ordinary civilians and some Indian loyalists holding out against a determined group of "Sepoy" (Indian troops) during the Great Mutiny of 1857. It is one of three book about Imperialism, British-style, Mr. Farrell wrote in his short life. Sadly, the Oxford-educated writer, who appears to have the talents of both a genuine wit, keen psychologist and vivid historical reinactor, died in 1979 at age 44 when a wave struck him during a fishing trip on the rocks near his home in Ireland in 1979.

The main characters in the book find themselves under siege in a provincial town in northern India at the time of the Great Mutiny of the regular indigenous soldiers against the East India Company, a war triggered by the introduction of a type of cartridge for the new Enfield rifles that the Muslim troops believe contains pig fat as a grease, thus making it seem an attack on their culture.
The uprising (or revolution) at first comes to the main character of the book, Hopkins, East indian official, through dispatches and rumor and some small biscuits that suddenly appear mysteriously in a dispatch box in his office. Hopkins is known as "The Collector" in the book and he is a classic 19th Century Positivist who visited the Great Exhibition of London while on leave from his employers in 1851. His faith in science and technology from industrialization is solid, so much so that he brings out statues of Shakespeare and Keats and Socrates and other Western thinkers to decorate his office and remind him of the "superior" culture that justifys the subjugation of Indians of all races and sects.

Then bad things happen. British officers stragger from a local fort into Krishnapur, the survivors of the spreading mutiny. Many are severely wounded and others have fresh tales of cut-throat engagements with their former local-recruits: privates, corporals and sergeants who have opened fire and put the Europeans to the sword. The Sepoys make up most of the active forces in northern India and the British troops are outnumbered and spread too thin to come to any timely relief. British confidence, built up over a century of progress in subjagating northern India, is shattered.

The siege goes on for weeks. All European and Eurasian citizens crowd their way into the Residency ,where a last-ditch effort is made to survive. What was a ground for cricket games and picnics and official festivities showing off a replica of "proper" Victorian society abroad is ripped apart by shell and shot. The stench of the dead, animal and human, surrounds the besieged. The necessity of burial parties and desperate counter-attacks to fend off the enemy and capture some food and cannon shot become the new pastimes of any man not already dead or unable to stand.

The European ladies are trapped in the relative safety of the chapel, making bullets out of anything metal they can find and forbidden by prejudice from taking amore active part in the defense of their lives. The poverty-stricken natives gather outside about the perimeter of the Residency, waiting for the Union Jack to be struck down and the slaughter to commence.

Stripped away of their sense of superiority to nature and the natives by deprivation, near-starvation, and a growing lack of hope in rescue, some go off the beam while others reassess their lives and their faith either in religion or Eurpopean scientific progress; all pretense of class distinctions ebb away as well.

Farrell does an excellent job in the beginning of the novel, both in establishing the main characters and having some fun wagging at the old-style romantics of Victorian romance. There are two men who just arrive in India in the novel's first chapters: a young idealistic chap named Flurey, a romantic fellow with a head filled with Byron and Coleridge, and a brave but rather callow young officer. Both men are after a pretty young lady who they first meet in the luxury and safety of the port city of Calcutta, a bastion of British power and the place where much of the opium trade to China is situated. All three will see their world turn upside down at Krishnapur.

The young "hero" of the book is a visiting English travelling gent and university educated poet named Flurey. This is no dashing hero--more like just a smart fellow with the wrong training in the worst possible place. He has to bone up quickly on the military arts to help the British officers and Sikh loyalists in defending the residency. The book is, according to the introduction, very much in the style of the romantic and pro-colonial "Mutiny Novel" that was popular for many years in Britain, where a young soldier and a lady he fancies find themselves thrown together by the insurrection and the Indian forces outside the walls of whatever town ship are always bloodthirsty savages.

But Farrell takes the obsolete "Mutiny novel" to a very different place, where more emphasis is made on anti-romantic, mordant humor and insecurities among the "middle managers" of empire. There are also and some flat-out hilarious passages (such as two doctors arguing over the right treatment for cholera whenever one recovers enough from the other man's treatment to argue against the cure) and the imaginative day-dreaming of Flurey, who fancies that his new -found military bravado will get him a big story in the London Illustrated News.

If Mark Twain and Rudyard Kipling had teamed up to write a novel and to accommodate each others style, "The Siege of Krishnapur" might well have been a similar result. This is an older book, but one that has been reprinted several times--most recently by the New York Review of Books Press. To me, it is worth seeking out.

Monday, May 14, 2012

"The Foggy Dew"--The Wolfe Tones--Song of the Easter Rising, Dublin, 1916.

 

I'm not Irish, but I love this song. It's based on a sad but inevitable chapter in history---the beginning of the modern Irish Free State and later Republic when nationalists under the banner of the United Irish Volunteers and other groups known as "Fenians" to the British  marched on Dublin on the day after Easter, April 24, 1916, to the General Post Office at the center of the city. Other points were attacked as well but the GPO assault was the last to fall. What  these few men were willing to risk here was the catalyst for a nation. It was a nation that would see a continuing war as many of the leaders (16 in all) were executed after surrendering.

 

A terrible urban guerrilla war was launched in 1917 by Michael Collins  and other IRA leaders. It was countered by British forces, including over 8,000 "Black and Tans" (recruited from World War I ex-soldiers who couldn't find work in England) who came in 1919-20 to shore up the Royal Irish Constabulary and created some of the worst attacks on civilians since Oliver Cromwell's invasion in the 1650s.

 

In 1921, the Irish Free State was born out of a negotiated settlement by Collins and other Irish leaders with Lloyd George's government. Conflict over a demand of continued loyalty to the British King sparked a Civil War in Ireland with nationalists--a war that still scars Ireland today.  There was great bloodshed over the  full republic goals of Eamon DeVelera against the Free State advocates.  Michael "Big Fella" Collins was assassinated for signing the Free State treaty.


 By the 1930's DeValera was in power and the old IRA elements he once favored were outlawed. Ireland became an independent republic in the 1950's. But it all started here, and this song to me celebrates the terrible price men and women pay for wanting to govern themselves, a right mostly taken for granted in this world.

The opening clip from this video is from the Ken Loach film "The Wind That Shakes the Barley" from 2007.  I would recommend that film to anyone who wants to see a searing drama about those times.  

 

 

 

Facts about the uprising... from basicirishfacts.com   

"The GPO on Sackville St was occupied at noon on Easter Monday 24 April and the Proclamation of Independence read out from the front of the building by Padraig Pearse.

"The GPO was occupied by a mixture of Irish Volunteers and Irish Citizen Army.

"Edward Daly commanding the 1st Battalion occupied The Four Courts, Mendicity Institute, Jameson’s Distillery, and North King St.

"Thomas McDonagh commanding the 2nd Battalion occupied Jacob’s Factory.

"Eamonn De Valera commanding the 3rd Battalion occupied Boland’s Mills, Landsdowne Road, Westland Row Station, Mount Street Bridge, and Northumberland Road.

"Eamonn Ceannt commanding the 4th Battalion occupied South Dublin Union, Marrowbone Lane, Roe’s Distillery, Ardee St Bakery, and Cork St.

Eamonn Ceannt’s second-in-command was Cathal Brugha.

"Michael Mallin commanding a unit of the Irish Citizen Army occupied St Stephen’s Green, Royal College of Surgeons.

"Michael Mallin’s second-in-command was Countess Markievicz.

"Séan Connolly, commanding a unit of the Irish Citizen Army, occupied City Hall

"The first casualty of the Rising was a 45-year-old unarmed policeman from Co Limerick, Constable James O’Brien.

"He was standing at the entrance to Dublin Castle shortly before noon on Easter Monday when a volunteer cycled up to the gate and shot him dead.

"Lt A.D. Chalmers, 14th Royal Fusiliers was in the GPO conducting business when the rebels entered and he became a prisoner of war.

"On 24 April, after an attack on Beggar's Bush Barracks, 2,500 reinforcements arrived from The Curragh.

"They retook City Hall and Séan Connolly was killed in the attack.

"He was the first rebel casualty.

"On 25 April Brigadier-General WH Lowe assumed command of British forces in Dublin. Reinforcements arrived from Belfast and Templemore and the rebels in St Stephens Green were forced back to the Royal College of Surgeons.

"Martial Law was also declared on 25 April.

"On 26 April HMY Helga began shelling rebel positions. The Mendicity Institute was recaptured.

"On 27 April British Forces regained control of Sackville Street and began shelling the GPO and The Four Courts.

"On 28 April General John Maxwell assumed command of all British Forces. The burning GPO was abandoned by rebel forces. The rebels retreated to Moore Street.

"On 29 April the insurgent leaders in Moore Street decided to negotiate a surrender.

"The emissary sent to make preliminary arrangements was Nurse Elizabeth O'Farrell, a member of Cumann na mBan.

"At 3.30pm Pearse surrendered to Brigadier-General Lowe at the corner of Sackville Street and Great Britain Street (now O'Connell Street and Parnell Street).

"At 3.45 pm the instrument of surrender was signed at British HQ at Parkgate.

"Due to several contradictory orders, volunteers in Cork and Tyrone dispersed on Sunday 23 May.

"There were small scale engagements in Wexford, Galway, and Meath.

"The last incident of the Easter Rising took place on 1 May with the gun battle at Thomas Kent's house in Co. Cork.

Easter Rising318 insurgents and civilians were killed and 2,217 wounded.

116 British soldiers were killed, 368 wounded, and 9 were reported missing.

13 Royal Irish Constabulary were killed and 22 wounded.

3 Dublin Metropolitan Police were killed and 7 wounded.

3,430 men and 79 women were arrested.

170 men and 1 woman were tried by Court Martial.

16 men were executed.

1836 men and 5 women were interned.

1,272 were subsequently released after further investigation.

All remaining internees were released on 18 June, 1917.

Monday, February 6, 2012

'Downton Abbey" or "The Recent Unpleasantness at Ye Olde Manor"

Since the Super Bowl had limited appeal for a 49er fan, I think the high light of my television watching   time was seeing a new episode of "Downton Abbey" on PBS.   It's a program that brings American viewers the fun of watching members of the British  elite behave stoically in stressful situations--like poor Lord Grantum (Hugh Bonneville) who doesn't have a direct male heir with his two male cousins going down on the Titanic in 1912. 

What to do?  Well, put on your Sam Browne belt and go to war!  Except the old boy is past it--he had his war in South Africa against the Boers-- and nobody  wants him at the front.  But they would like his drawing rooms for an Army hospital since the  Western Front keeps running up a big butcher's bill and a lot of brave men of all classes are filling up the other extra hospital spaces with  what's left of their bodies and mental and psychic faculties.   

Lord Grantum has problems--it's not all running about in uniform with no place to go fight.  First, he married  an American heiress named Cora (Elizabeth Mc Govern) back in the day.  The viewer knows she's American because she says so at least twice in every episode.  She gave him nothing but girl babies.  The law will not let old Grantum give Downton Abbey  to any of his three daughters.  This, to me, was a very stupid law.  But it's great for fiction purposes.   

There's the  elder daughter who has a dark secret involving having  a dead Turk turning up in her boudoir one night (don't ask).  She's now engaged to be married to a nasty press baron who wants to use his  money and her pedigree to be a blue blood, to live large in the hustings while running his Fleet Street scandal sheet.  

His second  daughter is besotted with a radical  Irish chauffeur who lost his brother in the Irish Revolution that began in 1916.  (Oh dear.) Plus, Lord Grantum  has his manor entailed to a middle class second cousin.  This solicitor cuz  has a liberal/reform minded mummy (!) who is  keen on having the over-sized manor home tuned into a some permanent soldiers' home and/or a  settlement house for the poor.   

His third daughter is secretly married to a hedgehog. 
 
OK, I made that last part up.  I don't know what his third daughter is doing.  I think she's a nurse or running a Dead Turk Removal Service out of the back of a pub. I promise to pay more attention in the next episode.  

All these  trade-rich and middle-class parvenus,  and working classes servants are most loyal to the status quo, save   that grim-faced little maid, Mrs. O'Brien (Irish....again!)   whose always eves-dropping on other folks and is always up to no good.   

The show runs it's melodramatic course with above-average writing and moments of genuine human emotion---it's not great stuff, but good enough for all the twists and turns needed to make fans come back for a new episode. The head writer and producer, Julien Fellowes, did an excellent job with his recent adaptations of Jane Austen works to the small screen, so he knows this upstairs-middle stairs--downstairs   territory and its potential to hook viewers very well.   
  
 The whole class thing is blunted by World War I, which ended on last night's program.  Historically, all British classes take took it in the neck one way or another.  The only death in the show comes from a servant. Lat night, the Lord led all the family and servants in a sober observance of the Armistice with this touching  phrase 

"We've  all entered into a new age!" 

Uh, maybe. 

    Aas far as I can see the writers on this show are  going with the old Talleyrand line of  "the more things change, the more they will stay the same" angle, at least as far as life in the over-sized housing pile in Berkshire known as Downton .   I  find this stuff--how the past is filtered and reconstituted for entertainment--a keen way to spend an hour  a week.  

For more on the show, here's a recent article in the Los Angeles Times by Television critic Mary MacNamara: 

http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/tv/la-ca-critics-notebook-downton-20120205,0,5978755.story

  
By conveniently blurring the class distinctions of the time with a lot of noblesse oblige and more than a dash of modern psychology, Fellowes and his writers allow their audience the benefits of a romantic period piece and none of the troubling drawbacks. The absence of race as a major issue may provide the American audience an instant comfort zone — Americans love to pretend that we, unlike our mother country, are an egalitarian and socially mobile society — but "Downton Abbey" is, after all, a British version of "The Help," the tale of an oppressive social and economic system that is finally being called into question.

http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/tv/la-ca-critics-notebook-downton-20120205,0,5978755.story

Tuesday, October 11, 2011

A Conspiracy of Paper

Rating:★★★★
Category:Books
Genre: Mystery & Thrillers
Author:David Liss
"These financial institutions are committed to divesting our money of value and replacing it with promises of value. For when they control the promise of value, they control all wealth itself,"--Playwright and scholar Elias Gordon to his friend, "detective" Benjamin Weaver.


"A Conspiracy of Paper" is a riveting murder and crime-in-high-places mystery. It won the Edgar Award in 2001 as the Best American Mystery of the Year and also won awards for best first novel of the year. At least two other "Benjamin Weaver" books have been published.

The novel, by the American author David Liss, is set in the colorful and treacherous world of early Hanoverian London, with all its coffee houses, gin mills, theaters, gambling dens, and the emerging "new finance" capitalist engines such as the South Sea Company. It's 1719 and the South Sea Company is on the verge of losing 98 percent of its stock value, creating the first stock-driven financial panic in English history. But the public is unaware that the South Sea Company, set up to do business in South America, is about to go bust. The rivalry between "stock-jobbers" (brokers) and their over-extended clients forms the background of the story. The "new finance" groups like South Sea are also getting their hooks into the heights of the British political elite, creating rivalry with the more staid financial powers like gold traders and The Bank of England.


The narrator is a former professional boxer, Benjamin Weaver, who has become the 18th Century equivalent of a private eye. He is known in the lingo of the time as a "thief-taker", a man who makes a living recovering stolen goods for well-off victims of crime gangs, and occasionally catching the crooks and turning them into the law courts and the nascent legal system for a reward.

Weaver is a first -generation British Jew who changed his last name from Licenzo to a more Anglicized name when he becomes a professional boxer. (He is partially based, according to the author, by the memoirs of a then-famous real-life British-Jewish boxer of the time, Daniel Mendoza. Mendoza is considered the father of modern boxing. His innovations like "boxing rings" and the science of movement and punching are still part of the sport. )

Liss' main character is hired by an rich gentile anti-semite named William Balfour to look into the death of Balfour's father. Balfour informs him that the death of Weaver's own estranged father--run down by a drunken coachman--is linked to his own father's death.

Weaver is a much sought-after "thief-taker" because he is essentially an honest man, and he is tough enough to go anywhere in the dens of London vice to ferret out criminals. (There are no police in London at this time, and only an ineffectual constabulary and a lot of crooked judges stand for anything like a system of law enforcement in the 18th Century.) Weaver's main rival is a crime lord named Jonathan Wild, who has a syndicate dedicated to promoting thievs (who then turn their goods over to Wild so he can sell them back to their original owners.) Wild, a real-life figure who was the subject of a book by Daniel DeFoe, also employs goons to cart some thieves off to Newgate Prison and face either the hangman, deportation or a stretch of the hell on earth jail could be for those without money or influence.

Weaver's tracking down of this and other important cases he takes on simultaneously weaves him into a hard-core Darwinian world of both the heigths and the depths of London. It's a city with opulent theaters and gentleman's clubs and a vibrant society, but it is also a society made nervous by the "new finance" and the stock-jobbers of Exchange Alley and this new mania for owing stock that may (or may not) make them rich--or break them.

Weaver also gets back in touch with his Jewish roots through his uncle's family. The novel is not sparing in detail and it captures very well the precarious existence of Jews (who had been banned from England from the time of Edward I in 1300 for three and a half-centuries) and how they did business and kept themselves generally both a part of the British economy and also culturally aloof due to gentile bigotry and also pressure from their elders to carry on the culture and the faith. Every good private eye novel has a pretty lady and this novel has Miriam, a widowed cousin of Weaver who both catches his eye and also leads him unwittingly into greater danger.

Given the financial dis-settlement of the last five years, "A Conspiracy of Paper" seems like familiar territory today for those who read about the financial chicanery of today. It's a fast-moving and instructive historical novel and its also a hard-boiled suspense story.

Friday, September 2, 2011

September 3, 1939--Headline from the Day World War II Begins




Articles from the San Francisco Chronicle, saved over 70 years ago by my father-in-law Wilson Slater, when he was a young history major and California National Guardsman at Stanford University, reveal how the world-shaking but hardly unexpected events of the previous few days had changed the world.

My father-in-law expected that America would be in the war, sooner or later. He was not alone in this opinion.
The paper cost 5 cents daily and a dime on Sunday. This was an extra edition probably on the streets of the city being hawked by news boys a scant couple hours after Neville Chamberlain's BBC address declaring the war had begun. Already in the paper it was reported children in London were started to be evacuated, babies were being issued gas masks and some English people were reportedly killing pets to spare them from a rumor that pet food would be banned for the duration of the war. Both England and France pledged to support President Roosevelt call not to use bacterial gas or fire on non-military shipping of Germany for a time. The Duke of Windsor and his wife were returning to London.

But in other ways, life in America went on. There were also articles in the Chronicle this day on New Yorkers being enthused over new General Motors and Ford cars coming out for 1940. The great radio and film comedian Jack Benny was coming to San Francisco to perform with his violin and his comedy routine at the Pacific Exposition at the man-made Treasure Island, a de facto World's Fair in the middle of San Francisco Bay. Seven million people had already visited the many sites there featuring expositions sent from all nations, including Czechoslovakia and Poland. The comics page was printed as usual, people were urged to visit Buenos Aries, Argentina, for the Fall in a travelogue section, and there were ads for everything from blood pressure medicine to "studios of oral expression" for public speaking tips.

Just another day, like the one two days before:

September 1, 1939
by W. H. Auden


I sit in one of the dives
On Fifty-second Street
Uncertain and afraid
As the clever hopes expire
Of a low dishonest decade:
Waves of anger and fear
Circulate over the bright
And darkened lands of the earth,
Obsessing our private lives;
The unmentionable odour of death
Offends the September night.

Accurate scholarship can
Unearth the whole offence
From Luther until now
That has driven a culture mad,
Find what occurred at Linz,
What huge imago made
A psychopathic god:
I and the public know
What all schoolchildren learn,
Those to whom evil is done
Do evil in return.

Exiled Thucydides knew
All that a speech can say
About Democracy,
And what dictators do,
The elderly rubbish they talk
To an apathetic grave;
Analysed all in his book,
The enlightenment driven away,
The habit-forming pain,
Mismanagement and grief:
We must suffer them all again.

Into this neutral air
Where blind skyscrapers use
Their full height to proclaim
The strength of Collective Man,
Each language pours its vain
Competitive excuse:
But who can live for long
In an euphoric dream;
Out of the mirror they stare,
Imperialism's face
And the international wrong.

Faces along the bar
Cling to their average day:
The lights must never go out,
The music must always play,
All the conventions conspire
To make this fort assume
The furniture of home;
Lest we should see where we are,
Lost in a haunted wood,
Children afraid of the night
Who have never been happy or good.

The windiest militant trash
Important Persons shout
Is not so crude as our wish:
What mad Nijinsky wrote
About Diaghilev
Is true of the normal heart;
For the error bred in the bone
Of each woman and each man
Craves what it cannot have,
Not universal love
But to be loved alone.

From the conservative dark
Into the ethical life
The dense commuters come,
Repeating their morning vow;
"I will be true to the wife,
I'll concentrate more on my work,"
And helpless governors wake
To resume their compulsory game:
Who can release them now,
Who can reach the deaf,
Who can speak for the dumb?

All I have is a voice
To undo the folded lie,
The romantic lie in the brain
Of the sensual man-in-the-street
And the lie of Authority
Whose buildings grope the sky:
There is no such thing as the State
And no one exists alone;
Hunger allows no choice
To the citizen or the police;
We must love one another or die.

Defenceless under the night
Our world in stupor lies;
Yet, dotted everywhere,
Ironic points of light
Flash out wherever the Just
Exchange their messages:
May I, composed like them
Of Eros and of dust,
Beleaguered by the same
Negation and despair,
Show an affirming flame.






Thursday, July 7, 2011

Charles Dickens, Superstar: "American Notes" and his Farewell Tour

"Prejudiced, I am not, and never have been, otherwise than in favour of the United States. I have many friends in America, I feel a grateful interest in the country, I hope and believe it will successfully work out a problem of the highest importance to the whole human race. To represent me as viewing AMERICA with ill-nature, coldness, or animosity, is merely to do a very foolish thing: which is always a very easy one."--Charles Dickens, from his original preface to "American Notes". 


Charles Dickens was a month shy of his 30th birthday when he landed for the first time in the United States. He returned to America twenty-five years later in 1867 and 1868 to give a series of popular readings which were a great success. Between those two trips both  commentators in the United States and Charles Dickens had a falling out of sorts. His books, however, remained popular with the reading public and it was Dickens the popular and tireless artist and speaker who triumphed over his critics.   


Although hailed as the most popular novelist of the time while in America, Charles Dickens first trip to the United States (from January to June, 1842) was marred by controversy.  Reading his travel and journalism book, "American Notes (for General Circulation)" today one finds it hard to find anything controversial or deliberately vindictive about it.
 
Dickens toured factories, prisons and asylums; took stagecoaches on rough terrain; travelled with his wife in canal and river boats and, at least on the eastern seaboard, experienced the rigors of early American railroads. Much of the humor and drama of his extensive journey comes out in the details he brings to these trips.  Dickens preferred  to ride on the tops of stage coaches, for instance, and frequently suffered all types of inclement weather and bad roads and the fear that his coachman was going to land him and his party in a ditch or the midst of a river ford. All of this was of course comparable but more primitive than he and his wife Catherine (Hogarth) Dickens were used to.           

The things that got under Mr. Dickens' skin while visiting the young republic were things that have long since lost any motive for taking a  contrary position upon. His first "mistake" was to call for Americans to recognize authors' copyrights, not exactly a radical idea today. He also had nothing good to say about the "peculiar instituton" of chattle slavery.  What would one expect from a man who loathed cruelty and came from a nation where slavery had for decades been unsupported by law?  

He shocked audiences of VIPs and the press in New York and Boston when he called for Congress to pass an International Copyright Law to protect both American and British authors from having their work pirated.  He cited the poverty of fellow author Walter Scott as a good reason to  support a common sense law.  But the idea of "intellectual property"--which would have protected the works of popular American writers as well--was met with harsh attacks by the American newspapers.  He tried to get other American authors like his friends Washington Irving and Henry Longfellow, to support him, but to no avail. 
 
The strongest supporter for International  Copyright was Senator and ofttimes presidential candidate Henry Clay of Kentucky, the man known as the "Great Compromiser" for his efforts to forestall a civil war in America.  Clay tried hard, but failed in his own and Dickens' time. The international copyright law was not passed by Congress until 1891.  

 
(Charles Dickens at about the time of his first and second trips to America,respectively.)

His third dislike  was to find the habits of spitting tobacco to be disgusting.  He took notice of this for a bit of humor when he visited Washington City to meet President John Tyler and attend sessions of Congress. 
 

"Both Houses are handsomely carpeted; but the state to which these carpets are reduced by the universal disregard of the spittoon with which every honourable member is accommodated, and the extraordinary improvements on the pattern which are squirted and dabbled upon it in every direction, do not admit of being described. I will merely observe, that I strongly recommend all strangers not to look at the floor; and if they happen to drop anything, though it be their purse, not to pick it up with an ungloved hand on any account."

 
 The fourth "bad move" was to notice and report that  many Americans lacked reserve  when meeting people of re-known. (He and his wife were mobbed by well-wishers, local big wigs and plain old "stalkers" at all the hotels in any city they stayed at.)  His young American secretary, George Putnam, was hard-pressed to give him some private space and to keep up on the local invitations and the spontaneous "meet-and-greets" of mobs of well-wishes and badgering press hawks Dickens generally endured for hours on end in hotel lobbies, streets. He was even mobbed by ladies, Paul McCartney style, when just trying  to get a haircut in Baltimore.  Some females reportedly requested pieces of his hair on that occasion, hopefully after it was already cut!    

Here I think we see the beginnings of the modern "cult of celebrity" in America.  One might express surprise that  Dickens didn't see the adulation coming, given reports of the popularity of "Boz" (his nickname)  with, among other works,   "The Pickwick Papers", "Oliver Twist" and "Nicholas Nickelby".  
 
  Perhaps he didn't read accounts of the old hero of the American Revolution General Lafayette's tour of America in the 1820s, which was quite a circus of adulation  in its day.  

 Still, Dickens kept a great deal of this 19th Century American Beatlemania  out of his "American Notes", preferring instead to confine his consternation to private letters to friends--like his close friend John Forster--back home.    He also made no mention of the copyright controversy in the book.  Much of it is focused instead on his day-to-day travels which stretched all the way from Washington and then down the Ohio River valley by steamboat to St. Louis and then further westward for a day's trip to see the vast prairies that led to the frontier lands. 
 
Here is a part of his view of Cincinnati, Ohio: "Cincinnati is a beautiful city; cheerful, thriving, and animated. I have not often seen a place that commends itself so favourably and pleasantly to a stranger at the first glance as this does: with its clean houses of red and white, its well-paved roads, and footways bright tile. Nor does it become less prepossessing on a closer acquaintance. The streets are broad and airy, the shops extremely good, the private residences remarkable for their elegance and neatness."
 
This is a usual passage in the book; many positive reflections like this abound, along with some measured negatives about being in contact with grumpy people or that strange  American propensity for settling domestic maters with firearms.  Again, its hard to see what his contemporary American critics could be so upset  about. This is far from a perfect view of America, nothing scholarly here except perhaps the final chapter which takes slavery to task through newspaper clippings and books Dickens used to prove his point that it was a cruel and wanton waste of humanity.  But it is a travel book, not an encyclopedia!     
 
Modern critic and historian Christopher Hitchens called "American Notes" 'Dickens worst book.' Better I think to recall an earlier intellectual critic, the American Edmund Wilson, who said  "Dickens' picture of the United States in 1842, at a period of brave boastings and often squalid or meager realities, has a unique and permanent value"
 
 To me, Hitchens is most unfair.  Charles Dickens was trained first as a journalist and reading his book it is clear that he leaves the editorializing to a minimum.  He was not one of those English travellers of a Tory persuasion who were in habit of coming to America to put down the republic mainly to, as John Whitley and Arnold Goldman in the Penguin Classics Introduction suggest, mainly to discourage the hundreds of thousands of skilled workers who are already leaving Britain every decade for America between 1815 and 1859. At the same time he is not given to overpraise American institutions  as some radical writers had done as a way to bring reform to U.K.  Parliamentary election scandals, poor workers' conditions, broader voting rights for male citizens,  and other progressive struggles of the time. 
 
When he meets Americans he likes, he is unstinting in praise.   When some person or institution fails to meet his liberal-minded expectations, he is direct and sharp but not bigoted.

In 1867, against the advice of friends and his doctor due to ill-health, "The Inimitable" returned to the United States. The idealistic young man was now a seasoned and weathered man of 55, and not a young 55 even for those times.  Hard work at his writing and public appearances at home had made any long travel difficult.  He was also  without the company of the young actress Ellen Tiernan, who had replaced Catherine in his affections.  (The couple had divorced in 1859 after she had borne him ten children.)  
 
The 1867-68 tour was a huge success. Dickens, according to a biographer Peter Ackroyd, received about $200,000 for his well-honed recitations of his written works.  And, whatever the professional critics had to say about "American Notes" back in the 1840's, it had little if any effect on the public in post-Civil War  America. Thousands came to see him during his more modest, travel-wise, tour of the East  Coast.  Many camped out in front of theaters for tickets to see the rock star of their time.
 
His success was complete by the time the tour closed in New York City; thousands of his regular  readers saw him off on the ship back to England in the harbor. He waved his hat from the ship back to the harbor throng, getting the same hearty cheers he had received at the end of his performances in theaters and lecture halls.

Dickens left behind an edition to his "American Notes" after this second tour. It was a postscript to that book and his "Martin Chuzzlewit" novel (partly set in America) that records a deeper understanding of the United States and of himself, taken from a dinner in his honor in New York on the eve of his return to his homeland:  

"`So much of my voice has lately been heard in the land, that I might have been contented with troubling you no further from my present standing-point, were it not a duty with which I henceforth charge myself, not only here but on every suitable occasion, whatsoever and wheresoever, to express my high and grateful sense of my second reception in America, and to bear my honest testimony to the national generosity and magnanimity. Also, to declare how astounded I have been by the amazing changes I have seen around me on every side, - changes moral, changes physical, changes in the amount of land subdued and peopled, changes in the rise of vast new cities, changes in the growth of older cities almost out of recognition, changes in the graces and amenities of life, changes in the Press, without whose advancement no advancement can take place anywhere. Nor am I, believe me, so arrogant as to suppose that in five and twenty years there have been no changes in me, and that I had nothing to learn and no extreme impressions to correct when I was here first."       


 

 


Friday, July 1, 2011

Trip to London and Environs--May 1985


This was not far from my hotel at Kensington Close. I'm pretty sure this was the first picture I took that first morning after jet lag wore off.

These pictures are some "surviving" prints from a trip I took to England in 1985. I say surviving because when I got home two of the rolls of film I took were destroyed by some machine foul-up at the local One-Hour Photo labratory I was used to going to back home.

Consequently the pictures I had of places like Regent's Park, my bus trip out to Hampton Court and a later rail trip to Winchester to see the cathedral there came out just a brownish mess! Oh, to have had a diigital camera twenty six years back.

These are some shots from the first two rolls I had. All in all it was a great trip and my wife and I plan to go to see more of England and other parts of the Isles together one of these days.

It was a very nice visit, although it could have rained more! :-)

Wednesday, June 8, 2011

Film of the London Blitz in colour unseen for 70 years




I always am keen to see film footage from the past that has been left unacccounted on a shelf or a vault. This is from a report last year about actual color footage taken during the Blitz on London in 1940-41. This is not the newly developed computer-generated colorization process imposed on monochrome film, but the real thing!

The advantage of color film I think brings a sense of heightened reality to any documenatry-style footage. These short intervals of amateur cinema remind us that these events happened among people very much like ourselves, tested them beyond anything most of us who are younger could imagine and brings the words and images of wartime to a deeper level of consciousness.

The people shown in this film footage were a small part of the first military loss dealt to the Third Reich. It is, therefore, a critical record I believe of preserving freedom in the Western World.

Wednesday, May 11, 2011

Harold Nicolson: The War Years, Diaries and Letters 1939-1945

Rating:★★★★
Category:Books
Genre: History
Author:Harold Nicolson, Nigel Nicolson
"To be a good diarist, one must have a snouty, sneaky mind."--the author

This 1967 book comprises a record of the British Parliament from the viewpoint of a cabinet officer and later backbencher Harold Nicolson (1886-1968) during the time he was a witness to many of the backstage workings of the British National Coalition Government until 1941 and later as a witness to secret sessions in the chambers of power and other important meetings.

When the writer/politician was removed from his place as an assistant cabinet (to make way for a Labour party minister) he spent the rest of the war as a backbencher, while still writing histories, doing weekly newspaper columns and giving pro-Allied speeches in neutral nations like Sweden and parts of North Africa recently liberated by the Allies in order to boost the war effort. HIs 1939 book, "Why England is at War" was also a major success.

After Nicolson was asked to leave by Churchill he still was on good terms with the likes of the Prime Minister, Anthony Eden, Harold MacMillan and others who steered the country as well as visiting Americans like influential newsmen Edward R Murrow and William Shirer.


The refreshing thing about reading the diary of an insider to major events is not how often Nicolson got things right--sometimes he didn't as when he predicted that Stalin would keep his promises at the Yalta Conference or when he seemed assured The USA would enter the war after Roosevelt's reelection in 1940. But it is his intelligence and descriptive powers that are on display here.

Nicholson also was a best-selling novelist and biographer, journalist, diplomat (on hand with Lloyd George at the Versailles Conference in 1919), Governor of the BBC and the husband of one of Britain leading poet/novelists Vita Sackville-West. Their "open marriage" and lovers of the same sex is an issue covered by their son, the writer Nigel Nicholson (1918-2004) in his own biography of his parents lives' "Portrait of A Marriage" (1973)

This diary focuses on the Nicolson's public career, his affectionate letters to his wife and his two sons (Nigel and Ben) who are both fighting in Europe and North Africa. There is also his personal doubts about the war effort and flights of enthusiasm he had even in the darkest times about Britain emerging victorious. That he held this spirit despite the long odds that events in 1940-41 (the Fall of France, the evacuation of Dunkirk, The Battle of Britain, et al) held for the Allies and later served as a champion to the cause of the Free French government in exile speaks well to his character. (Although he had misgivings about General DeGaulle, who was a difficult man to handle to put it mildly and gave fits to many a greater contemporary.)

Nicolson has a lot of humor in his writing, at one point describing the Deputy Prime Minister, Clement Attlee, as a singularly unimpressive speaker, rather "like a snipe pretending to be an eagle" and somehow making the news of a British victory in North Africa sound almost as a defeat. His praise of Churchill is higher, although he steers clear of being a hero-worshipper and takes hm to task for being too boastful at times and, later, not supporting the Free French cause with enough vigor. The descriptions of Churchill in the House bring the man and the moment to life. This is as close as we shall get to having a camera view of this era and how its ministers and members behaved in a multi-party government during times of great stress.

There are also Nicolson's concerns that their renovated, partially- Elizabethan home in Kent (Sissinghurst) he shared with his wife will make it through the war and all those involved in the grounds will of course survive.

There's something rather British in the way Nicolson and his wife concern themselves with the garden in a time when one bomb could have taken either one of them out separately or together. Indeed in the darkest time of the war (1940) both husband and wife were prepared to commit suicide by poison rather than fall into the hands of the Gestapo.

The strangest part to me is that, as a governor of the BBC, he argued that he's rather lose a son in battle than lose a great work of architecture like the Monte Cassino monastery in Italy. Other than that I find nothing in Nicolson's diaries presented here that doesn't either inform or delight.

His son Nigel gives an overview of the progress and red-letter events of the war at the beginning of each year to better frame his father's records.

Wednesday, January 5, 2011

Katherine Jenkins - "I Vow To Thee My Country" (Gustav Holtz/Sir Cecil Spring-Rice )




PhotobucketA British anthem taken from a portion of Gustav Holst's "Jupiter--Bringer of Jollity", from "The Planets, Op. 32."

Holst, born in 1874 in Cheltenham, England--that's his statue (above) in the city park--composed this section of his five planets symphony during the First World War. The synphony was first presented in London in 1918 with Adrian Boult as conductor.

The lyrics came from a poem by British ambassador, Sir Cecil Spring-Rice, who was posted in the United States during the Administration of Woodrow Wilson. Spring-Rice's lyrics were incorporatd to the music in 1921.

Here are the first and third verses, as sung in the video:

I vow to thee, my country, all earthly things above,
Entire and whole and perfect, the service of my love;
The love that asks no question, the love that stands the test,
That lays upon the altar the dearest and the best;
The love that never falters, the love that pays the price,
The love that makes undaunted the final sacrifice.
I heard my country calling, away across the sea,
Across the waste of waters she calls and calls to me.

And there's another country, I've heard of long ago,
Most dear to them that love her, most great to them that know;
We may not count her armies, we may not see her King;
Her fortress is a faithful heart, her pride is suffering;
And soul by soul and silently her shining bounds increase,
And her ways are ways of gentleness, and all her paths are peace.

(A second, more militant verse, is usually omitted in present day.)

Sunday, September 5, 2010

A Country of Vast Designs: James K. Polk, the Mexican War and the Conquest of the American Continent

Rating:★★★★
Category:Books
Genre: History
Author:Robert W. Merry
James Knox Polk was a protege of the better-known American general and President Andrew Jackson. He was the eleventh president and, though despised and reviled by many of his rival Whig Party enemies (including a young Congressman, Abraham Lincoln) , the United States had a territory 500,000 square miles larger than it had been four years earlier when Polk first took the Oath of Office on a rainy day in Washington City in March of 1845.

The better-known Jackson served two four-year terms (1828-1836) and ignited a new democratic spirit in the nation--a spirit that because of the times was confined to working white men and small farmers, and not include women, blacks, or Native-Americans.

Jackson, "Old Hickory" he was called, was a hard-bitten rawhide figure who managed to gain great success during the War of 1812 by defeating a British force at the Battle of New Orleans and later driving Native-American fighters like the Seminoles off their lands.

He was the first President from the then-frontier state of Tennessee, and the neo-Jeffersonian champion against the forces that wanted a National Bank. (Which he felt put too much power in the hands of New York speculators, among other things.) Jackson is immortalized still on the $20 bill and remained an immensely popular Chief Executive until the beginnings of the modern Civil Rights Movement.

And yet, you could make the argument that James K. Polk, the man known as "Young Hickory" , did more in the four years he was President (1844-1848) than his mentor did in eight.

Polk was an accidental President in many ways. A former shining light in the Jacksonian Democratic Party, stalwart Polk (1798-1849) had gone from point-man for Jackson to Speaker of the House in Congress in the mid-1830's. He was from the same state as the shrewd and imperious Jackson and basically didn't go to the bathroom without consulting the older man.

A few years later, however, the rival Whig Party started to gain ground thanks to the leadership of Henry Clay, a Congressman who popularized an "American System" of internal improvements (canals, roads, port facilities) into the growing nation. The Whig Party was a national movement that favored high tariffs to develop the nation. This was seen as favoring the industrializing centers of New England and the Mid-Atlantic and Upper Midwest where slavery had been pushed out of existence. Low tariffs, favored generally by the Democrats, helped promote trade with Britain, France and Europe--especially agricultural crops like cotton, which were slave-labor dependant.

Polk was a defeated candidate for governor of Tennessee in 1843. The political career of this Tennessee plantation (and slave) holder seemed to have peaked and he went back to the town of Columbia, south of the state capital, Nashville, to lick his wounds.

But one year later Polk was back in the ascendancy. He had his name placed in nomination for the Vice-Presidency. With a new "two-thirds" approval rule in the Nomination Convention in Baltimore, Maryland, however, none of the favorite candidates could pull off a super-majority of the delegates. A compromise candidate was needed, someone who was from a border state (like Tennessee) who could draw both Northern and Southern support. And Polk--after multiple ballots--got a bigger prize than he had hoped for.

It was a hard-fought national campaign for the Presidency, however. Polk's opponent was the great Henry Clay himself. Clay has served in Congress longer than Polk and had a national reputation as "The Great Compromiser" who had staved off clashes between free and slave states in the young Republic. Along with Daniel Webster of Massachusetts and John C. Calhoun of South Carolina, he was one of the three greatest political leaders of the Jackson Era and remained so until his death. Yet Polk beat him--narrowly, in part, the author states, because Clay underestimated how important the expansion of the nation was to many voters, particularly those who wanted to see the new republic of Texas (which had gained independence from Mexico in an Anglo-American inspired uprising a decade earlier) admitted to the Union.

Clay was lukewarm on the Texas issue, knowing that it would lead to problems with the balance of power between slave and free states. (Texas was a slave republic, which was one of the reasons white men fought to be free of this part of Mexico's northern frontier. Mexico has abolished slavery when she won independence from Spain.) "Young Hickory", however, was pro-Texas, and he also articulated in his letters to his followers--it was considered unseemly to openly campaign in those days--- that he wanted as much of the Oregon Territory as well, which was then jointly administered by the USA and the British through their Hudson Bay Company.

He was also not shy about being prepared to go to war with Mexico to secure Texas and also take New Mexico and California as well, either by purchasing them from the cash-strapped Mexican government or by conquest.

A "war of choice" you might say.

There is enough political intrigue in "A Country of Vast Designs" to keep any history nerd like me enthralled. Polk himself is not a very intriguing figure, but he was focused and stubborn and, whatever can be said for the immorality of the Mexican War--which cost 11,000 American lives and many more Mexican ones--he changed the map of America forever and made it a transoceanic power. The careful negotiations with Great Britain over Oregon, where Polk was at odds with his own more-cautious Secretary of State, James Buchanan, also make for interesting reading. If Britain and Mexico had formed an alliance against American western expansion, as Buchanan feared, it would have been a disaster.
That was another thing about Polk, he was not a great leader, but he was damn lucky.

Well, except for the fact that he died four months after he left office from disease author Merry says says was brought about by stress and exhaustion battling with Congress and his own cabinet over the shape of the nation and its fiscal structure.
It is likely his early death that prevented James K. Polk--The Napoleon of the Stump-- from getting his rightful share of both Machiavellian credit and moral blame for the "vast designs" of America in modern America. He personified the Age of Manifest Destiny.

Here's a song about the 11th President, courtesy of the off-beat 80's rock band They Might Be Giants


Thursday, February 4, 2010

London in Technicolor ! (1927)




Two-strip technicolor footage of London from 1927, courtesy of a friend who sent me this link today from The British Film Institute. Despite the rather corny intertitles between shots, this to me is remarkable footage.

The earliest technicolor feature films I know of came out of Hollywood around 1922, and were few and far between. The most famous pre-sound color film was Douglas Fairbanks' "The Black Pirate" from 1925.

In America, Technicolor company that created similar technology only possible to shoot short films like this as novelty items. The British company that shot this footage was using very expensive equipment for its time. (Credit is given here to Claude Friese-Greene for the photography--I would guess he was the son of early cinema pioneer William Friese Greene whose attempts to be creditted for the invention of moving picture stock was the subject of the excellent 1951 film "The Magic Box" with Robert Donat.) Whether Mr. Friese Greene was working with the American Technicolor Company, which patented its two-strip process in 1922, is something I'm not certain of as yet.

Since it was only a two strip process--mostly highlighting reds and blues--the green colors are often muddy. Better results had to wait for the three strip color Technicolor process from 1933 on. Because of The Great Depression, color films remained limited in number for many more years to come.

Monday, November 2, 2009

Troublesome Young Men: The Rebels Who Brought Churchill to Power and Helped Save England

Rating:★★★★
Category:Books
Genre: History
Author:Lynne Olson
Ms. Olson's 2007 history tells the behind-the-scenes work of the "troublesome young men", mostly "backbenchers' in the Tory Party in the late Thirties, who changed the course of history to favor elective government, and at least saved Great Britain from a traumatic defeat if they had not strenuously opposed a government keen on a "phony war", even months after it officially entered a very real war one against a rearmed and confident Germany.

It was left to less well-known men like Duff Cooper, Leo Amery, Robert Cartland, Harold Nicholson, future Prime Minister Harold MacMillian and a handful of other "rebels" to step up and, in Amery's words, "Speak for England!"

It is men like Amery and Cartland, not Churchill or Anthony Eden, that stood defiant against their party Whips and the Cabinet at several critical moments, risking their careers. Men liked Cartland were not afraid to call Chamberlain a dictator to his face; Amery evoked some devastating words from England's history against his government during open debate in the House of Commons after the Fall of Norway (and the disasters of British ships and men in the subarctic ports in May of 1940) with scorn:

"I have quoted certain words of Oliver Cromwell. I will quote certain other words. I do it with great reluctance, because I am speaking of those who are old friends and associates of mine, but they are words which, I think, are applicable to the present situation. This is what Cromwell said to the Long Parliament when he thought it was no longer fit to conduct the affairs of the nation:
"You have sat too long here for any good you have been doing. Depart, I say, and let us have done with you. In the name of God, go".



The story of Britain's change of government in 1940 after the fall of Norway in the Spring of that year is well-known and oft-dramatized. But was less-known (to me at least) was how little a role Winston Churchill ultimately had in hastening the departure of the discredited Neville Chamberlain.

Churchill was in fact already in the government as First Lord of the Navy by September 1939, and had no voice in deposing his boss. He was loyal, too loyal to those who recalled those days in Ms. Olson's books. The Chamberlain government--outside the Admiralty--seemed daunted by the prospect of actually carrying out a war, much less mounting a land offensive. The Prime Minister's letters to his sister reveal Chamberlain's acute depression at the sight of pillboxes, barbed wire and armaments. He was, as one critic put it at the time, "a civilian to the core." Not an evil man, but the wrong leader for his time.

Even after war was declared, conscription of men ages 20-41 was slow to happen. As Hitler's fifty divisions on active duty strengthened, the British could manage five or six. Those who volunteered for the RAF or the Army or Territorials were often joining units that had no uniforms for them to wear, much less heavy weaponry. Over a million and a half men were still unemployed by the end of 1939, an alarming statistic given the national emergency.

And those "Tommies" at the Belgian Front and those sent half-prepared to Norway, ahead of the looming German air-sea advancement, were hardly equipped to fight. Few units had any machine guns, for instance. Basic anti-aircraft equipment was equally hard to come by.

When visiting the Belgian front in December of 1939, Chamberlain startled one of commanders in the field, Bernard Montgomery, by stating in a meeting, "I don't think the Germans have any intention of attacking us here, do you?"
Montgomery told his boss otherwise, but, like so many others, he paid little heed.

Chamberlain, nicknamed "The Coroner" by his detractors, clearly had to go.


The problem was the Conservative had a huge 200-seat majority from the last General Election in 1936. The Labour and Liberal parties could not mount a serious challenge. Any vote of no confidence had to garner a major amount of Conservative supporters. It was here that men like Amery and Duff Cooper--who turned down the offer of Foreign Secretary to remain an independent critic--had to sway their reluctant party stalwarts to cross over and vote "NO" on a confidence vote to bring Chamberlain down. And that movement had to be successful; to fail at bringing down Chamberlain would mean he could hold unto power well into the future.


Chamberlain and his men tapped the phones of Conservatives who met in private to plan strategy. That hurt the cause, as did the fact that the rebels were disunited between pro-Anthony Eden and pro-Churchill groups. Sending out feelers to opposition leaders like Clement Attlee and his Labour Deputy Arthur Greenwood was considered the height of betrayal by a leader who short changed his troops in the field. Chamberlain was content to know "sub rosa" what groups like "The Vigilantes" and other internecine groups were doing.

This is the part of the book I found most interesting; how Neville Chamberlain, like Richard Nixon thirty-odd years later, viewed all attacks on his government as an attack on him personally and could brook no dissent in his inner circle, thus filling important posts with syncopates and second-raters. Perhaps his worse move was getting rid of Foreign Secretary Anthony Eden over the Czech Crisis in October, 1938. It was clear more voices needed to be heard in the Cabinet if Hitler was to be successfully defeated. Stripped of office but not prestige, the Young Mr. Eden remained a dithering disappointment to his followers; Churchill emerged as the man of the hour.

The question of rebellion was totally anathema to many of these men who were all educated at strict schools like Harrow and Eton where loyalty and bowing to seniority was everything. Many had served in the ranks of regiments in the First World War together, makes their effort to depose there former superiors in some cases all the more improbable.

Some 'Young Men" (like MacMillian) were moderate men who saw the changing times and tried to adapt to them; others, like Leo Amery, who hidebound imperialists in the Churchill mold. Addingto their natural conservatism, there were great personal differences: the most juicy being that that MacMillian made common cause with one of the "young men" (Robert Boothby) who had cuckolded him, carrying on a decades long affair with his wife Dorothy. But work together they somehow did, saving their nation against their own senior leadership.

Note: not all the "Troublesome Young Men" were men. Women such as Violet Bonham Carter, the daughter of Prime Minister Asquith, also played a role in drumming up anti- appeasement support. And the case of Katherine Scott-Murray, Duchess of Atholl ib Scotland and one of the few female MPs of that era, deserves an entry from Wikipedia:

"She was the Scottish Unionist Party Member of Parliament for Kinross and West Perthshire from 1923 to 1938, and served as Parliamentary Secretary to the Board of Education from 1924 to 1929, the first woman to serve in a Conservative government. She resigned the Conservative whip first in 1935 over the India Bill and the "socialist tendency" of the government's domestic policy. Resuming the Whip she resigned it again in 1937 over the Anglo-Italian Agreement. Finally she resigned her seat in parliament in 1938 in opposition to Neville Chamberlain's policy of appeasement of Adolf Hitler. To permit her resignation (technically proscribed by law), she was named Steward of the Chiltern Hundreds on 28 November 1938. She stood in the subsequent by-election as an Independent but lost her seat.

"According to her autobiography Working Partnership (1958) it was at the prompting of Ellen Wilkinson that in April 1937 she, Eleanor Rathbone, and Wilkinson, went to Spain to observe the effects of the Spanish Civil War. In Valencia , Barcelona and Madrid she saw the impact of Luftwaffe bombing on behalf of the Nationalists, visited prisoners of war held by the Republicans and considered the impact of the conflict on women and children in particular. Her book Searchlight on Spain resulted from this involvement, and her support for the Republican side in the conflict led to her being nicknamed by some the 'Red Duchess'. Her opposition to the British policy of non-intervention in Spain epitomised her attitudes and actions."

None of the male Tory "rebels" came to her direct aid during that bi-election. The best Churchill could offer in 1938 to "The Red Duchess" (who was no more a socialist than Donald Duck) was a letter of support, and a lukewarm one at that.

The following is an interview with Lynne Olson from a Canadian broadcast.


object width="425" height="344">

Saturday, October 24, 2009

NFL Football in London; Will Permanent U.S. Bases Be Established?

(above--New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady tries to kick a football like a soccer ball at the Brit Oval, a cricket facility near London.)

Roger Goodell, Commissioner of the National Football League, the most powerful and successful of the professional sports leagues in America, seems bent on laying the groundwork for an NFL franchise in  the United Kingdom. The scheduled game between the rather lackluster Tampa Bay Buccaneers and the powerhouse New England Patriots is the third  regular season meeting between two NFL teams in as many years. This one will take place at Wembley Stadium.  

According to ABC News, 70,000 tickets have been sold for the game, with 20,000 tickets going in the first seven minutes of availability.  The question is: is this a novelty, or a trend toward a keen interest in American football?     I find this odd because to me because  attempts to bring world football (i.e., Soccer)  over here been rather a dud.  The Major League Soccer (MLS) league in the States is small potatoes and hardly draws large crowds in the ten orr so franchises that are in operation. 

Is there really that much interest in a full-time NFL  franchise in the land of Manchester United, Liverpool, West Ham  and Arsenal? Goodell seems to think so, or want people to think so. 

From the Associated Press:

"The League (NFL) is now looking into playing at least two games a year in Britain, he said. Aside from London, Manchester and Glasgow, Scotland, are being looked at as potential venues.

"I expect that sometime in the next couple of years, we could be playing multiple games here," Goodell said. "If we brought more than one game here, and it continues to have the same kind of enthusiasm and growth of interest, I think that is about as good of an indicator you can get that it could successfully support a franchise. And that's what we're looking at."

Personally I have my doubts about a franchise so far away from all the other NFL teams in North America. And it should be noted the second largest city in America, Los Angeles, might be aa better place to locate a new franchise than a city six thousand miles from the NFC and AFC West Conference teams.  

 Basketball is a more popular international sport, so why the NFL and not the NBA? Perhaps the fact that games are only played once a week during the regular season could make it more economically feasible to have an NFL  team across  the Atlantic.  In theory, at least. I'd like to know what British sports fans and my fellow NFL followers in the USA  think of the viability of this one. 


Here's one of my favorite themes from the old NFL Films "This Week" series, that ran weekly during the 1970's and 80's, showing highlights of the previous Sunday match-ups. The music is called "Classic Battle".

Thursday, September 24, 2009

The Wordy Shipmates

Rating:★★★★
Category:Books
Genre: History
Author:Sarah Vowell
"I'm always disappointed when I see the word "Puritan" tossed around as shorthand for a bunch of generic, boring stupid, judgemental killjoys. Because to me, they are very specific, fascinating, sometimes brilliant, judgemental killjoys who rarely agreed on anything except that Catholics are going to hell".--Sarah Vowell, "The Wordy Shipmates"

Ms. Vowell's latest book is about the Puritan settlements of the 1630's in modern-day Massachusetts, USA. Back then the place was called the Massachusetts Bay Colony. Their leader for nearly twenty years was Governor John Winthrop, a Cambridge educated theologian whose word was pretty much the law. They had left England, these couple hundred souls, mainly because they wanted to practice the Christian life their own way, and the squeeze was on back home. King Charles I had disbanded the Parliament in 1629 because the Puritans in the place were the main culprits preventing him from raising money for a ceaseless war with Spain and were ticked off that he was doing things--like arresting MPs--that were in contradiction to the tradition of the Magna Carta. Since a revolution seemed a long way off, around 20,000 people, who were not keen on Charles and the pomp and heavy-handedness of High Anglican officialdom, left England in the time before and during the English Civil War.

The book focuses on Wintrop's achievements--such as the founding of Harvard University--originally a theological institution, in 1635, and the grim things--such as leading the settlers against Native-Americans in lob-sided military affairs that come close to genocide.

This 2008 book is not a formal history, but is rather a tour de force of biting humor, measured with some respect for the better actions of men like Winthrop, who besides being an authoritarian in the Calvinist mode, was also an idealist who believed that God sent him to America to help build a "city on a hill" for the world to admire, a New Jerusalem for a new Chosen People no les. These small bands of English from East Anglia (mainly) helped shape modern American politics in ways we can still see nearly four centuries after they set up shop.
In between dealing ruthlessly with political/religious dissidents, and killing Native-Americans who resented their intrusion into a place already heavily ravaged by European diseases like smallpox, Winthrop and his fellow colonials lay the groundwork for the dicey relationship between Church and State in America. Unlike many of today's modern lay Christian Protestants of the fundamentalist variety, they were well-read and believed that they could fail and God would not give them a break (or a tax cut) if they did fail. American Presidents, especially Ronald Reagan, have used "the city on a hill" motif in their campaigns. Reagan called America "a shining city on a hill" over and over again, adding the word "shiny" to Winthrop's initial remarks (from a 1631 sermon called "A Model of Christian Charity") as a bit of razzmattazz worthy of a former General Electric pitchman. In Vowell's entertaining book, the early colonial past and the modern American colossus of McDonald's, Theme Parks, Native-American casinos and CIA prison camps for alleged terrorists are all woven in to the narrative in a way that might be a bit jarring but never seems too forced or off-the-subject.