Thursday, February 26, 2009

Nadya "Octomom" Suleman: Motherhood as Media Sideshow

The Cult of Celebrity in America has drawn a new and so-far successful high priestess. She is Octuplets Mother Nadya Suleman and she is the woman who after already having six children went a little crazy down at Ye Old Fertility Clinic and had eight embryos put into body.  All eight were born, making her family consist of one single mother who is working on a college degree (a Masters Degree in Advanced Biology, I presume) and has little visible and legitimate means of ever supporting this baseball team of a family in the long term.  

 

 NBC News and The Oprah Winfrey Show have already done major stories about this family.   "The Today Show" in the morning devotes several minutes to this story. Only the downturn in the world economy is a bigger television story. Nadya has achieved  celebrity, for whatever short shelf-life that will bring her.  Even her mother and father are now  reluctant celebrities. . 

I have already seen the interview she did with Ann Curry on "Today". Before I could switch off  "Today" the folllowing  morning, my voyeuristic nature got the better of me. I was treated to seeing her argue with her mother on a videotape shown on "The Today Show".  Nadya's mother is having problems understanding why her daughter had so many kids after already having given birth to six.  (Grab a number and get in line, grandma.)

 It's sad.  Sad for her.  Sad for her parents, who seem like good people blindsided by the actions of their daughter.  I can only imagine what is going to happen to many of these kids when this lady suffers an inevitable breakdown when the cameras and the interviewers go away in a couple years.  (Foster Care most likely)  One television "psychiatrist" named "Dr'. Phil", whose not a real shrink but a great huckster, claims that she is "addicted  to being pregnant". Schrewd analysis there, Phil.  I would also add she is  addicted to getting her face on "People" or "Us" Magazine without going  through the trouble of becoming an actor or a model or a politician or billionaire.  

 The prime reason she had all these kids, it appears to me,  was to draw attention to herself, to use fecundity to create a cult of celebrity around herself.   It has already been reported that she had facial surgery to make herself look more like Angelina Jolie. And the media and yes, consumers of media like yours truly are  enabling her with interest in these interviews. 

Maybe Nadya can finagle some money out of these enterprises.  I honestly hope she can-without having to do anything too sordid. She is going to need some major day care services in the immediate time. And since it is estimated it now takes about $200,000 to get a child into adulthood in America, she'll need all the dealing skills and kindness of strangers  she can muster.  But at some point the media is likely to walk away and leave Ms. Suleman and her vulnerable children to their own devices.  

It's very unlikely that all this will end well for her, or these children.  Fourteen children, eight of them infants and many of the others, still young, seems to be too much for two well-established parents, much less one lady who may have an attention-addiction problem. It is reported that she is now considering an offer to appear in a porno film to make a million dollars, according to the New York Post.   Most likely the state of California  will have to step in and try and deal with the wreckage of this reckless woman actions, and those of her doctor who implanted so many potential kids into a mother of six. 

Don't get me wrong. I revere motherhood and respect ordinary women who choose to raise children without a husband.  But this is not an ordinary woman in a situation remotely manageable. If anyone sees a bright side to this developing train wreck of a story I'd love to hear it.    

 

14 comments:

  1. Fourteen kids seems rather extreme.

    I find myself a little interested in a juxtoposition having just come from Aaran's page where one Jade Goody was being commented on. Jade (a racist little so and so btw) is another mother dying publicly from cervical cancer. Funny how the news of both your countries is focussed on errant mothers this week. Is this a distraction from the wealthy fathers with their hands outstretched to receive their bailout funds?

    To be honest Doug, I am rather blown away (yet again) by the practices of your privatised IVF industry. IVF in NZ is run by the Public Medical system and long ago it was brought into law that no more than three embryos can be implanted into one mother at a time. So rather than slam a rather foolish young woman, (who no matter what she has done really does require both physical, emotional and financial support right now, if she is going to bring up all those kids), I am much more inclined to first; slam the US governments for allowing the ridiculous scenario of emplanting so many embryos to continue - its a miracle that the eight even survive the pregnancy, carrying multiples is hard work - I know this from carrying two even. So many times in these huge pregnancies the parents are left watching helplessly as one after another of their babies die. Or some of the babies are born with major challenges like cerebral palsy. (Incidentally, how well are Nadya's children?) In other pregnancies, American parents are given options of "deleting" some of the babies in order to allow the others to live and be viable babies. How soul destroying is that?

    Why are IVF programmes still allowed to implant so many babies into anyway? Why are they not better monitored and controlled? And who is the absolutely idiotic and stupid doctor that implanted eight embryos into a woman who already had six kiddies? Why don't we hear about him/her? Why is this person and his/her practice not being investigated?

    Incidentally I seem to remember somewhere along the line, a white two parent family where the mother gave birth to 8 or 9 babies? I don't recall hearing anything about whether they could afford to bring up such a huge family, rather that people/media were all going on about what a "miracle" it was and they got a house and heaps of stuff donated to them.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Are you suggesting the corporate media would stoop to use this story to offset the rancid tales of big-time male bankers being bailed out at taxpayer expense? I hadn't considered that, but now that you mention it...you are probably right.

    Perhaps I was too hard on this woman, Iri Ani, to the partial exclusion of a overly libertarian/ privatized health system that does little or nothing to regulate what could have been a series of stillborn children. (As far as I recall, the children are all in good condition--here is the latest on the babies' condition I could locate:
    http://www.mercurynews.com/breakingnews/ci_11793266

    I agree a better health care policy would have prevented this "extreme" number of kids. The IVF doctor is reported being investigated. Perhaps better laws will be enacted. There are "professional guidelines" as to how many embryos can be implanted, but no regulations.
    (The idea of having one baby kicking around inside me is impossible to imagine, much les eight. Carrying two babies had to be hard enough I'm sure.)
    Personally I don't think I would be less outraged if there was a father in the picture, but I can't speak for the public at large. Yes, there was a family in the Middle West who had a bunch of newborns and their birth was treated in a more celebatory manner. To me--couple or no couple--this should have been illlegal simply on the grounds of common sense.

    Thanks for your comments.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Doug just "jumped" in here and if she had the money to raise so many children I would not have any problems with it. I have seen her talk several times and I think that if she was not contriving an image and then trying to gain a bail out it would be fine. But I think there is more to it. Laughing here as she looks like what my ex would look like now - had place that one in. But all in all in these times doing this and living off the "system" is not the right thing to do at any time - for the children that is, and especially during times like these.

    Either she is going to have book out and make money, which I don't think will go over now, or the kids will be in foster homes pending what a state does as I think there is some mental illness illustrating itself in some manner. I am pretty open minded but this really does not go over with me. The house that she was having the interview with was her mother - so they say on the media but if so I would really like to see what the situation is at her own place/home. Lastly, how does one on her own raise so many children?

    There are many things to consider but I think that this was something done without the realization of what the outcome would be. Most of all what will be done with the children < there is the key in all of this.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree there, Jim. I try to be open-minded but I really think there should be a limit placed on the number of fertilized eggs in one woman's body. But its been done and now I just hope she or some group will help her with the all these children.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Well you know what, I have brought up five on my own - it was easier after the bloke was out of the picture. We finally had consistency and stability. So I am not into knocking women on their own quite frankly. I think society should be spending a lot more time and money supporting mothers and children (with or without husbands/fathers) rather than on bailing out wealthy corporates who have yet to learn how to budget properly.

    Mostly I am against super-size pregnancies. Having children is not like ordering a supersize burger at MacDonalds.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Oh golly so I did. Naughty me. lol

    ReplyDelete
  7. Many social programmes were implemented by Hitler to encourage the growth of a strong German Nazi Volk. One such programme was to advocate the virtues of motherhood.

    This programme included a gigantic Nazi propaganda campaign to urge women to increase the size of their families. Cash incentives were paid for each child born. On the 16th of December 1938 Hitler instituted a new award to honor German Nazi motherhood, especially the large family. The cross of Honor of the German Mother (Ehrenkreuz der Deutschen Mutter) was created in three classes bronze, silver and gold.

    This woman would have definitely been awarded the Gold Medal and in fact she has been by the corporate media.
    But I think the western media is rather more fickle than the Third Reich and as you suggest she will have to do something more salacious/outrageous to stay in the media lime light.

    If this had happened in the UK her fate would be to be deconstructed, criticised and condemned in the popular (gutter) press within the next couple of years and that story would be wheeled out to obscure the next unpopular policy initiative of the government.
    Perhaps Neil Young will be able to resuscitate his flagging career again next year by re-releasing his notorious Reaganite anthem 'Welfare Mothers' dedicated to this poor woman and her children?

    ReplyDelete
  8. I don't know much about this case, Doug, only what you have written really. Oh, but aren't the babies just adorable? All I can say is, I wish them all...... a happy and a fortunate life!

    Thank you, very interesting...

    Cassandra

    Hahaha, my comment always shoots off before I have finish writing!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Here here. The money spent on corporate bonuses and cleaning up unbridled capitalist messes could be better spent subsidizing mothers with or without adult partners.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I think you and Iri Ani are onto something here--the bread and circuses aspect of a high-multiple birth story can indeed help to obscure more serious reportage about what is going on amongst the well-heeled power brokers. Given the choice, the popular wing of the fourth estate over here always will choose to beat a dead horse of a story long after whatever news value is left to it.

    Interesting info on the Maternity Olympics dreamed up by Nazi Whizbangs. Congrats also on getting Hitler and Neil Young together on the same posting. "Keep On Rocking in the Free World", Neil's ironic take on Bush the Elder's "Thousand Points of Light" social programs from 1990, would also make for a good redo.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I think that's all we can hope for. At the end of the day, those children need to have time and the freedom from worry to learn and have fun like all kids.

    ReplyDelete
  12. This is a travesty! Both she and her doctor should be thrown in prison and the key thrown away. I feel for the kids. They are going to have tough lives. At least two of them have disabilities. The 8 babies have a chance to have disabilities as well.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I certainly agree that the doctor should be barred from practicing medicine at least, Fred. He reportedly has a 49-year old lady pregnant with four viable fetuses! (I'm no fertility expert but that seems reckless. I hope this other mom and her kids just survive. ) And one would think that planting six fertilized eggs into a mother creates a horrid chance for disabilities. One can only hope for the best for the kids in what could be a circus-like atmosphere.

    ReplyDelete
  14. My only regret is to not have sneaked the Dalai Lama in Doug lol

    ReplyDelete