Showing posts with label corporatepower. Show all posts
Showing posts with label corporatepower. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 7, 2012

The Corporate Olympians: Big Winners in London

In 1948, after two Olympics cancelled due to Second World War, London hosted the Olympics  for the first time since 1908.  The '48 Olympics were held in a nation still racked by devastation, both human and economic, and  rationing was still the order of the day.

No new facilities were built for the Olympic teams. The United States contingent were housed in an army barracks.  Many athletes brought as much of their own food as they could. But yet the Olympic Games  went on and proved to the world that the ideals of international competition and peace were compatible and achieveable.

While never perfect then or now, the modern Olympics has fallen a great deal to the powers of corporate sponsorship.  While there may be benefits in training and transportation for some athletes, most of them--save the big stars like Michael Phelps--are much like their colleagues from 64 years ago, winning medals while  scraping by working at jobs to support themselves while the big private media networks and the International  Olympic Committee take home the real gold.

 

 

From the San Jose (California) Mercury News August 2nd Editorial:

 

"No one goes for the gold quite like the International Olympic Committee.

"The NFL and its Super Bowl? FIFA, soccer's governing body, and its World Cup? When it comes to crass commercialism, they're pikers by comparison. The IOC will rake in $6 billion from the London Olympics, and its elite governing board couldn't care less that more than half of the participants have to work two or three jobs to make ends meet.

"Here's what the Olympic spirit means to IOC President Jacques Rogge:

"Any form of on-site criticism or protest is strictly forbidden before, during or immediately after the Olympics. The IOC insisted well in advance that Britain's Parliament pass laws giving it policing powers that would make Third World dictators jealous."

Read more here at this link below:

http://www.mercurynews.com/opinion/ci_21219796/mercury-news-editorial



Thursday, July 12, 2012

3 Dead Princes: An Anarchist Fairy Tale

Rating:★★★★
Category:Books
Genre: Science Fiction & Fantasy
Author:Danbert Nobacon
Danbert Nobacon bills himself as a singer, songwriter, comedian and "freak music legend". He was a founding member of the British anarchist punk band "Chumbawamba", whose most famous hit was "Tubthumping" ("I get knocked down, but I get up again..."). This 2010 book bills itself as "a fairy tale for adults of all ages" and that quite fills the bill. The tone is humorous and satirical but thankfully not pedantic. There is an underlying seriousness to this 192-page novel, which owes less to the tales of modern politically correct children's fare and more to Lewis Carroll's "Alice in Wonderland" and Anthony Burgess "Clockwork Orange" (not in violence but in made-up wordplay in the latter case.)

The story centers on a post apocalyptic kingdom called Morainia--which in geography matches the Pacific Northwest state of Washington where Nobacon currently resides, only this is centuries in the future. The heroine is a thirteen year-old girl, Princes Stormy. She finds herself with an absentee father-King Walterbald and a step-mother, Queen Gwynmerelda. As soon as her dad takes off on a secret mission, the nasty step-mom tries to marry Stormy off to a "toadying prancer" Prince Mercurio from the "Southern Kingdoms".

The story centers around Stormy coming into womanhood, avoiding the clutches of various lustful, dense and power-hungry princes (there is a hint in the title as to what becomes of them all) and, along with her intrepid fellow traveller, The Fool, finding her King-father, Walterbald, and rescuing him in the lands beyond the Great Ice Wall. Then comes the climatic Battle of Bald River Falls, a finish as memorable as C.S. Lewis classic and more conventional "The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe".

Along the way, she has encounters with invading armies--those darn Southern Kingdoms--giant cats, mermangels, giggle monkeys, a large black bird called the Gricklegrack that makes himself very useful in a pinch and the usual compliment of flying lizards no good work of serious literature should ever be without.

Nobacon surely has a way with words and the book comes with an interesting afterword about the need for "mutual aid" and its role in humanity's long evolution. Alex Cox, a film director of such films as "Sid and Nancy" (1983), "Repo Man" (1984) did the illustrations and they are wonderfully imaginative in the vein of books like Maurice Stendack's "Where the Wild Things Are" .

I have to thank Multiply's own Merlin of the Shire, Aaran Aardvark, for introducing me to more of Chumbawamba's music than I had been given a chance to appreciate before.

This is in fact a good book for anybody thirteen or over and can be enjoyed on several levels.

Critical bias warning: I got a chance to chat a bit with both Mr. Cox and Mr. Nobacon separately at this year Ashland Book and Author Festival last month. Both men were amiable to all who came by and said hello, and asked about their work. Mr. Nobacon, despite having once dumped an ice bucket on a deputy Prime Minister at the British Music Awards show in 1998, showed no signs of any aggressive behavior or intent to those who just stopped by without buying his book or his most recent CD releases. He was quite friendly to the freeloaders among us, which is more than would have been said of a ready ice-bucket flinger like myself.

Here he is at a signing appearence a couple years back.

Thursday, January 5, 2012

Boston Legal: Television With Conviction

 "Boston Legal" was a show that ran for five seasons on ABC and was one of the few long-running shows  that blended comedy and drama together in a unusually  offbeat and engaging manner.  The setting was a major law office which somehow manage to stay together despite some very disparate characters.  The main payoffs to this shows came in the court-room scenes and in the behind-the scenes relationships between pompous and past-it super lawyer-satyr  Denny Crane (William Shatner, nicely riffing on his reputation for playing authority figures) and Alan Shore (James Spader), a younger lawyer who specializes in  ringing closing arguments.      Crane represented the Red State conservative aspects of Fortress America and Shore was the liberal smart-aleck.  All the supporting cast, including Candice Bergen, Mark Valley and Constance Zimmer, made up a fine roster of actors.  

 Serious social and political issues of the Bush/Cheney Era came up frequently.    Here's an episode from the second season on a gun control trial.  

Although I can't endorse all of the writers' views on the Christian religion here, this next example is another of "Boston Legal" going unafraid into territory few American shows would dare tread.

 

 

 

 

This last clip has some graphic images but it shows part of the counter-argument against the assault on civil rights and the Geneva Convention that was carried out by Team Bush. Did it make a difference in the 2008 elections? Maybe not, but suffice to say this was an usually frank show that snuck in a  good political agenda in with the laughs.      

Monday, December 12, 2011

"'Hillbillies(?) versus Bankers": The Plot Against American Consumer Rights in Congress

Those of you old enough to remember a popular if inane situation comedy from the 1960's called "The Beverly Hillbillies" likely also recall a shady banker called "Mr. Drysdale".  Drysdale--no relation to the Baseball Hall of Fame Don Drysdale, the L.A. Dodger right-hander who helped pitch his team into their share of National League titles and some World Series victories--was a  caricature but like all caricatures that catch on, one with a kernel of truth to him.  Drysdale and his mythical "Commerce Bank of Beverly Hills" was always scheming up ways to try and hold on to the millions that were held by a family of rich bumpkins, headed by Jed Clampett, who struck oil in some hoary patch of land in the Ozark mountains. 


"They loaded up the truck and moved to Bevelree--hills that is," so the song went. And despite the fact that the Clampetts were out of their rural element, somehow they always got the best of Mr. Drysdale, the slick big-city banker.  This was a common theme in American pop culture at least since the rise of progressive politics in America in the 1890's--the notion that cities were full of corruption and greedy people, but it was the heartland of America that could always be counted on to uphold moral values and clean up the worst excesses of these metropolitan robber barons. 
   If only this notion were true.


As I see it, the truth is that the "heartland" people have for the most part been fooled and taken to the cleaners lock, stock and barrels by the real banker-schemers of American banking, investments and financial chicanery.  At least two trillion dollars in retirement savings and housing values have gone up the chimney in the last four years and is not coming back k. It's so bad that, as President Obama pointed out in a recent interview for CBS, many of these Wall Street investors manipulate the laws so well through their shock troops in the lobbying sector that what they did was not technically illegal.  That is, once the firewall between the investment banks and the regular commercial banks and mortgage industries was removed with the final repeal of the Glass-Stegall Act of 1933, sixty-six years after it was passed to prevent an economic calamity, Wall Street's major players indeed went on a spree, cashed in on their winnings and took the rest of us to the cleaners by the necessity of bailing them out.
O.K., a lot of you are saying this is old news.  Yes it is.  But what isn't old news--what is damn pertinent to people all over this nation and in Europe and other parts of the globe--is that these same high finance forces are fighting tooth and nail to prevent the establishment of new (i.e. restored  )  regulations to keep it from happening again.  A new Consumer  Protection Agency  has been established by an earlier Democratic-controlled Congress but now it faces being rendered powerless by the same people who put us all in an economic ditch.  
These banksters want to keep us as many folks as ignorant as possible of what their rights are and of what is really going on  when they sign on the  dotted line for a line of credit or a home mortgage.       

How fitting that today, when the powers of unregulated financial clout have driven us to the not-so pretty pass we see today--that one of West Coast's best editorial writers, Bill Varble of the Medford Mail Tribune, has drawn a paralell between the benign pop culture zaniness  of the 1960's to the malignant  aspects of unregulated consumer-capitalism of today. Here is the main thrust of his December 11 editorial: 


"The CFPB (Consumer Finance Protection Bureau) is the brainchild of Harvard law Professor (and now Massachusetts Senate candidate) Elizabeth Warren, who was passed over to lead the agency because Republicans objected to her, and because Cordray, although a Democrat, was considered more politically palatable. But Republicans, who had said for months they would block any nomination to run the agency, say it should have no director at all. They say it should be run by an "oversight board." And they want to require it to seek congressional approval of its budget instead of being funded by the Federal Reserve, of which it is a part.
"Republicans denied they want to weaken the new agency or undermine its mission to protect Wall Street cronies.
"This notion we are against consumer protection, that we're trying to gut CFPB, is just silly," Sen. David Vitter, R-La., a member of the Senate's banking committee, declared with a straight face.
"What's silly is to insist a new agency to protect consumers be run by a five-person committee, and that you get to hold the purse strings, and then to suggest there's any other explanation than the obvious: When it comes down to consumers vs. Wall Street, you're looking out for the Street.
"Where does it go from here? Bet on Obama appointing Cordray to the post through a "recess appointment" when the Congress is not in session, probably in January, and Republicans howling that that's not fair, and off we'll go again.
"In the meantime, the CFPB is overseeing mortgages to prevent some of the abuses that led to the mortgage meltdown, one of its main duties. It is not, however, doing anything about issues such as payday loan abuses. And as Washington watchers know, no agency in town is going to be effective without capable, energetic leadership.
In the classic TV sitcom "The Beverly Hillbillies," the money-hungry bank president, Mr. Drysdale, was always willing to jump through any hoops to toady up to the nouveau riche Clampetts. In real life, 99 percent of us are anonymous cyphers playing a zero-sum game with the colossus that is the financial industry."
  http://www.mailtribune.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20111211/NEWS/112110314/-1/news0104




 'Caveat Emptor' is a slogan we can no longer afford.  Regulations must be restored and consumers must have protections against under-handedness. To do otherwise, to let a second economic crisis befall us, would be the height of bumpkin-ness. 

It remains to be seen if enough American voters have learned the lesson--that rich or poor, smart or just aware , it doesn't pay to be a Jed Clampett.    

Thursday, October 13, 2011

Global mass protests 15th October 2011

Link

Gee, the "tea party" reactionaries aren't  the only bunch that can draw a crowd.   Check local listings in your paper this Saturday for a demonstration near you.  

 

Wednesday, October 12, 2011

Global mass protests 15th October 2011

Link

FYI: From Wall Street to Washington to town squares like my home town to European capitals and lots of other places, it's looks like groups like the USA tea party folk are starting to get some competition in the protest biz.   

Tuesday, October 11, 2011

A Conspiracy of Paper

Rating:★★★★
Category:Books
Genre: Mystery & Thrillers
Author:David Liss
"These financial institutions are committed to divesting our money of value and replacing it with promises of value. For when they control the promise of value, they control all wealth itself,"--Playwright and scholar Elias Gordon to his friend, "detective" Benjamin Weaver.


"A Conspiracy of Paper" is a riveting murder and crime-in-high-places mystery. It won the Edgar Award in 2001 as the Best American Mystery of the Year and also won awards for best first novel of the year. At least two other "Benjamin Weaver" books have been published.

The novel, by the American author David Liss, is set in the colorful and treacherous world of early Hanoverian London, with all its coffee houses, gin mills, theaters, gambling dens, and the emerging "new finance" capitalist engines such as the South Sea Company. It's 1719 and the South Sea Company is on the verge of losing 98 percent of its stock value, creating the first stock-driven financial panic in English history. But the public is unaware that the South Sea Company, set up to do business in South America, is about to go bust. The rivalry between "stock-jobbers" (brokers) and their over-extended clients forms the background of the story. The "new finance" groups like South Sea are also getting their hooks into the heights of the British political elite, creating rivalry with the more staid financial powers like gold traders and The Bank of England.


The narrator is a former professional boxer, Benjamin Weaver, who has become the 18th Century equivalent of a private eye. He is known in the lingo of the time as a "thief-taker", a man who makes a living recovering stolen goods for well-off victims of crime gangs, and occasionally catching the crooks and turning them into the law courts and the nascent legal system for a reward.

Weaver is a first -generation British Jew who changed his last name from Licenzo to a more Anglicized name when he becomes a professional boxer. (He is partially based, according to the author, by the memoirs of a then-famous real-life British-Jewish boxer of the time, Daniel Mendoza. Mendoza is considered the father of modern boxing. His innovations like "boxing rings" and the science of movement and punching are still part of the sport. )

Liss' main character is hired by an rich gentile anti-semite named William Balfour to look into the death of Balfour's father. Balfour informs him that the death of Weaver's own estranged father--run down by a drunken coachman--is linked to his own father's death.

Weaver is a much sought-after "thief-taker" because he is essentially an honest man, and he is tough enough to go anywhere in the dens of London vice to ferret out criminals. (There are no police in London at this time, and only an ineffectual constabulary and a lot of crooked judges stand for anything like a system of law enforcement in the 18th Century.) Weaver's main rival is a crime lord named Jonathan Wild, who has a syndicate dedicated to promoting thievs (who then turn their goods over to Wild so he can sell them back to their original owners.) Wild, a real-life figure who was the subject of a book by Daniel DeFoe, also employs goons to cart some thieves off to Newgate Prison and face either the hangman, deportation or a stretch of the hell on earth jail could be for those without money or influence.

Weaver's tracking down of this and other important cases he takes on simultaneously weaves him into a hard-core Darwinian world of both the heigths and the depths of London. It's a city with opulent theaters and gentleman's clubs and a vibrant society, but it is also a society made nervous by the "new finance" and the stock-jobbers of Exchange Alley and this new mania for owing stock that may (or may not) make them rich--or break them.

Weaver also gets back in touch with his Jewish roots through his uncle's family. The novel is not sparing in detail and it captures very well the precarious existence of Jews (who had been banned from England from the time of Edward I in 1300 for three and a half-centuries) and how they did business and kept themselves generally both a part of the British economy and also culturally aloof due to gentile bigotry and also pressure from their elders to carry on the culture and the faith. Every good private eye novel has a pretty lady and this novel has Miriam, a widowed cousin of Weaver who both catches his eye and also leads him unwittingly into greater danger.

Given the financial dis-settlement of the last five years, "A Conspiracy of Paper" seems like familiar territory today for those who read about the financial chicanery of today. It's a fast-moving and instructive historical novel and its also a hard-boiled suspense story.

Wednesday, September 21, 2011

The Man Who Sold The World: Ronald Reagan and the Betrayal of Main Street America

Rating:★★★★
Category:Books
Genre: History
Author:William Kleinnecht
William Kleinknecht is an Associated Press award-winning crime reporter for the "New York Daily News" and the "Newark (New Jersey) Star Ledger", has written a compelling book detailing the role of Ronald Reagan's domestic "trickle down" policies as president. It is not a pretty picture, nor, honestly, should it be.

Look around much of the United States today. Besides a huge recession that resists the two year recovery pattern one used to expect in these downturns over the last sixty years, we see an America middle class in full retreat, with a denuded public sector. The powers once in place to protect the values of people's homes, their jobs and their investments have all been stripped away by deregulation through corporate lobbying . And the biggest de-regulator pin-up guy of them all was Ronald Wilson Reagan.

Let's review:

In 1989, the savings and loan industry crashed. The tax payers were put on the hook for $150 billion. The bil to deregulate the savings and loan industry was pushed through Congress by the GOP and some conservative southern Democrats. .Reagan signed the bill, saying "this bill will make a lot of people wealthy". The era of private profits and pubic losses--since all S&Ls were protected with $100,000 dollars of federal bail-out money for each account in each S&L--had begun. Meanwhile, poverty in America went up under Reagan, not down as he promised and the promise he made wasn't kept until a Democrat, Bill Clinton, presided over a let-up in the late 1990's.


Both Clinton and George W. Bush continued to move ahead with Reagan's deregulation mania, the latter being the most enthusiastic. The Republicans who ran Congress from 1995 to 2007 followed suit. The result in part was the Enron mess, where an energy company not only jacked up rates on power and deliberately created shortages (rolling blackouts and brownouts) to consumers in California and other states, but also hid the fact that they were going broke from their own employees and stockholders for months while CEO Ken Lay and Jeffrey Skilling cashed out their stock and lived like kings. (Until Lay died and Skilling went to jail that is.)

But deregulation fever was not done, kids. In 2008, the economy really crashed. Major investment banks--Citigroup, Lehman Brothers, Goldman Sachs, AIG, et al---went belly up. The housing market, which had traded toxic mortgages and Wall Street, which created clever and opaque securities schemes issued by these banks were the culprits. The financial gimmickry together with deregulation and plain old cozy realtionships on the Washington-Wall Street axis did the rest.

Even those who had purchased rock-hard, non-adjustable mortgages found themselves living in homes that were now "underwater"--worth less on the market than they could be sold for the mortgage holder to even break even. Whole areas like Las Vegas and central California were slammed. Foreclosures sky-rocketed.

It is estimated by John McCain, the Arizona Senator and former Republican Presidential candidate, that half the homes in his state were technically "underwater". This in a nation where middle-class people had most of their wealth concentrated in the family home. Or in the 401k program at work, another place where even modest investors found themselves losing decades worth of savings just as many faced layoffs, underemployment or the failure of their small business due to lack of demand in industries like retail sales, manufacturing and construction .
Whole cities in the Middle West , including Reagan's boyhood home of Dixon, Illinois, faced enormous job losses as business, spurred on by tax breaks and low tariffs, headed for overseas climes to get their goods manufactured.

Some of this would have happened without Ronald Reagan you might be thinking, and I agree. But not all of it. Not by a long shot. It was Reagan who first went after the protections afforded by the Glass-Stegall Act of 1933 that separated the commercial banks from the potentially reckless ones. The process was slowly chipped away so that when Bill Clinton foolishly ended the Glass-Stegall protections altogether in a bill signing in 1999, there was little left to save.

But the taxpayer, somehow, was still on the hook. And so were all the people who suffered in the housing crash. The bailouts and the trillions lost that will likely never be fully recovered started in earnest under Reagan.

But why would the son of a shoe salesman and a housewife from rural Illinois, a man who entered the workforce from Eureka College in 1933 when the unemployment rate in the nation was over 24 percent, and a vocal champion of the New Deal of Franklin Roosevelt, have helped decimate the middle class, especially in cities and towns like Dixon, Illinois, his first home? What happened to this son of a midwestern working class family, and, more importantly, how is it that his vision changed America in a way so antithetically to the popular myth of Reagan as a cheerful and benign leader who was supposed to have "restored America" in his eight years of office?


The answer might be from Reagan's own fortunes long before he entered politics. He was a leading man in Hollywood, but somehow his bosses at Warner Bros Pictures saw him mainly as a light romantic lead. When television came in, and Reagan's film roles got worse (see "Bedtime for Bonzo') he began to cultivate powerful friends in the southern California business world. This led to him helping a powerful company, MCA (Music Corp. of America) get a blanket waiver from the Screen Actors Guild to both represent talent in Hollywood but produce programming and movies. Reagan was also a client of MCA and its soon-to-be powerful chairman Lew Wasserman.

He got a regular job as spokesperson for the General Electric Company in 1954 as the host of "GE Presents". It was produced by MCA, in case you hadn't guessed. Part of his duties as host was to go about the country on the company's behalf making speeches at GE plants and at business meetings. The "speech" Reagan delivered for GE became the blueprint for his anti-government trademark "The Speech", that he used effectively to get him into the governorship of California in 1966. Friends at MCA and other companies even bought property he owned near Santa Monica and Northridge (both suburbs of Los Angeles) at wildly inflated prices so he would be set for life financially for his troubles as a candidate.

Was Reagan "bought" or did he just see the light, as he liked to say later?

It really doesn't matter at this point. His manichean world view was either too pro or too anti-government throughout his life. (Was he ever a pragmatist? Yes. But only when his hand was forced by the legislatures in Sacramento and later in Congress.)

What matters is the damage that was wrought. Reagan doesn't deserve as much blame as the author gives to him I believe but he is the man who most embodied the spirit of free-market absolutism.

This book also goes into great detail to explain how Reagan appointed people to positions of power in regulatory agencies who had little interest in regulating the corporations they were supposed ot be watching. This was a trick George W. Bush learned all too well.

And so Ronald Reagan rode off into the sunset in 1989 and now he is supposed ot be a revered figure in American politics. Sad to say, really, for the truth is his rhetoric gave ammunition to a second generation of nihilistic Reagan robots who make him as President on some matters (like protecting Social Security and shoring up deficits by closing tax loopholes) now look like the old New Deal liberal he had been decades earlier.

If you like a little strong irony along the way with your true-life stories , this book is a good place to go to learn how we got into this mess.

Thursday, July 28, 2011

"What Became of Georgie Bush?", Or, "My! What Big Debt We Got, Grandma!"


The first graph shows the difference between budget projections and budget reality. In 2001, President George W. Bush inherited a surplus, with projections by the Congressional Budget Office for ever-increasing surpluses, assuming continuation of the good economy and President Bill Clinton’s policies. But every year starting in 2002, the budget fell into deficit. In January 2009, just before President Obama took office, the budget office projected a $1.2 trillion deficit for 2009 and deficits in subsequent years, based on continuing Mr. Bush’s policies and the effects of recession. Mr. Obama’s policies in 2009 and 2010, including the stimulus package, added to the deficits in those years but are largely temporary.

Anybody seen George W. Bush lately?

Other than a brief period where he came out of hiding at his mansion complex near Dallas to bask off the reflected glory of Bill Clinton's trip to meet and talk to Haitian earthquake victims (and wipe his dirty hand on Clinton's shirt at one point) or a few book signings for his "Decision Points" book (all done here in the United States to avoid problems with torture and the World Court) George is AWOL.

It is odd that Bush wants no part of the limelight for the job he did for the two terms he and his merry men and women served as the Chief Executive of the USA. Or maybe it isn't, given that the job was probably a major contributor, but not the only one, to the enormous recession we are still suffering from as a nation.


O.K., so Bush left the nation as it was swirling down from huge losses of credit in confidence in the wake of under regulated "too-big-to-fail" investment banks and a series of major tax cuts that benefited the wealthy but added no income to a national government busy fighting two major wars halfway across the globe. Add to this the Prescription Drug Plan for Medicare he got through Congress, which cost hundreds of billions but didn't raise taxes nor even allow the government to bargain with Big Pharma for reduced prices on drugs (as the Veterans Administration does) and the beginnings of the great corporate banking bail-out and the housing bubble burst that somehow he and his cabinet and their friends at the Federal Reserve never saw coming, or saw and just didn't care, and you have the situation for which the present administration is taking the majority of the blame.

Could it be that George W is lying low to not remind people he deserves a hefty share of the blame for the troubles we're in? He is, after all, an exercise buff and hardly in his dotage. Why was not out campaigning for his flock back in 2010? Why isn't he part of the current deficit debate, as is President Clinton who recently said he would allow the Congress to default on government debt and would invoke the 14th Amendment to stop such shenanigans?

I got an idea. Maybe George knows he screwed up and, indeed, just wants to lay low.

O.K, what did Georgie Boy leave us in economic terms when he left in January 2009?

According to two articles by Paul Wiseman of the Associated Press, the United States has the fifth highest debt percentage in the world among developed nations, comparing what it owes ($14.3 trillion) to the total economy. What the federal government takes in is 14.4 percent of the gross domestic product, the lowest share since 1950. (Thank the Bush tax cuts of 2001 and 2002 for most of that. Also thank the GOP Congress from 2001 to 2007 whose rank and file uped the debt ceiling several times.)

17.4 percent of the GDP of the USA is spent on health care. The next highest is twelve percent, spent by the Netherlands. It's the highest percentage among wealthy countries. Among 34 other wealthy nations, the average spent on health care is only 9.5 percent, according to the Organization for economic Cooperation and Development. (What did Bush do about that. Preach about "individual health care accounts", as if the average family could salt away 100,000 bucks in case one of their children gets in a car accident or contracts leukemia. Nice try , George.)

Surely, health care reform wasn't a silly idea after all.

"We as a society will either have to pay more our government, accept less in government benefits, or both," according to Douglas Elmendorf of the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.

I'm guessing the only rational way to go about this is to look seriously at both revenues and cuts in benefits. Obviously, with the diminishing power of the middle class in America, any choices not cutting entitlements will be much harder to achieve unless voters stop accepting the "trickle-down" economic policies and the Lords of the Flat Tax and the No New Taxes-Ever Bunch like radicals Michelle Bachmann and the pledge-happy lobbyist Grover Nordquist stalk the country, offering simple 19th Century panaceas to 21st Century issues. Bush provided cover for these nimrods for eight years.

But has the middle class really lost so much clout since Bush the Younger left office? Well, yes. "Wages and salaries account for just one percent of economic growth since the (US) recession officially 'ended' in June of 2009." Corporate growth on the other hand, according to the Wiseman Article "Boom in Corporate Profits, Bust in Jobs and Wages" accounted for 88 percent of the growth in the economy. (This is unprecedented in recent American history. Prior to Bush assuming office, previous recessions over the last thirty years had seen middle-class buying power rise anywhere from 15 to 50 percent after a recession receded. The average corporate gains after a downturn were anywhere from 28 to 53 percent.

US Corporations are seeing that the middle class has lost its buying power and is either rushing new jobs overseas or simply holding onto their accumulated post-recession bank of funds (estimated at 1.9 trillion dollars.)

And because of the present gridlock in Washington, in part caused by Bush's role of letting the adjustable-rate mortgage and over-the-counter derivatives breeds of foxes to guard the financial hen-house, we have a nation where there is no clear way ahead for the government to form a fiscal policy on. (Bush could have rectified some of this by impasse by coming forward and supporting a new series of regulations and strengthened agencies to stop what happened on his watch from happening again.)

Instead, he works out in his home gym and keeps his head low. Ex-Presidents are supposed to help the nation with their collective wisdom, not hide like a bandit on the lam. Surely Bush has learned something from the Economic Titanic he helped steer the nation into. You'd think he'd want to help make up for it, if only to get another big book deal.


Wednesday, July 20, 2011

Hard Times

Rating:★★★★
Category:Books
Genre: Literature & Fiction
Author:Charles Dickens
"Now what I want is Facts. Teach these boys and girls nothing but Facts. Facts alone are wanted in life. Plant nothing else and root out everything else. You can only form the minds of reasoning animals upon Facts: nothing else will ever be of of any service to them" ---from "The One Thing Needful", Chapter One, "Hard Times"

Reading this book for the first time, I found Charles Dickens 1853 novel "Hard Times" about a fictional northern English city of Coketown and its and its sterile and dark atmosphere an excellent read. It starts with a indictment of factory-based, facts-oriernted "model schools" for children. Then we meet the "Hands" workers with little life beyond work, and beauty and social amusement seen as a frivious luxury (Charity or justice is also frivilous to this doctrine of top-down industrial feudalism. ) And then we see the effect the doctrine has on the very people who promoted it. It is not a cheerful picture.

Dickens' indictment of misapplied utilitarianism,the factory-school system that existed to root out the hearts of the young and the hypocrisy that some of upper class and wealth, especially the loathsome "self-made man" Josiah Bounderby, try to foist on their factory "hands". The book succeeds as an entertainment with all the plot twists and come'upance you'd want from such a book. But also as a political novel in the same vein as John Steinbeck's humanistic "Grapes of Wrath" or his earlier novel about struggling workers in Depression-era California, "In Dubious Battle".

Mainly this is because it is not a political novel in the sense of a polemic, but one that serves as a dramatized plea for the better senses of human beings to be restored and put above base coinage, banks, and economic productivity. It does this by giving us characters and humor and changed minds of peole we can care about, not just straw characters and statistics.

And it speaks to our time as well, a plea to save human beings from the maw of simply being industrial (or, in our day) technological or retail/service industry cogs and tools to any of the masters of our community. There's a little Coketown wherever you go.

Humans need circuses in some form, time for drama and poetry and beauty and time to appreciate it all. We all have a divine spark that should be cherished. Those sparks shouldn't be starved of energy.

Below is an animated adaptation of the first part of the novel, from a graphic novel by Nick Ellis.


Sunday, April 3, 2011

GE Pays No Taxes on $14 Billion Income (?!)




Yes, it's true and I'm sure most people here have already heard about this. To me, it's one more indication that the corporate power of multinational entities over the federal government--through lobbyist and advisors in the White House cabinets of both major political parties in the USA---can hardly be overestimated on economic matters.

Some business groups complain that the US tax code has a top corporate rate of thirty-five percent and that's too high. OK, that's a debatable point and good people can disagree on this.

But for GE, that made an estimated 5 billion dollars last year in the USA alone, to pay no taxes? And to be subsidized by $3.2 billion?

This while our public schools have to cut back and our public universities increase tuition? This while our seniors are threatened by the Congress with cuts in Medicare? This while we are in such debt to foreign banks the government itself could shut down?

This is the sort of thing that might make reasonable people interested in civic affairs a tad cynical.