Showing posts with label classicfilms. Show all posts
Showing posts with label classicfilms. Show all posts

Sunday, October 30, 2011

The Original Nightmare Star: Lon Chaney Sr.

Silent film star Lon Chaney did his own make-up, creating a panoply of monsters and bizarre figures that paved the way for later actors in horror films to try and keep up with.   

One of those landmark films was the original "Phantom of the Opera" from 1925.  Seeing it late one night in a empty house waiting for my parents to return from some social event, I was about ten years old at the time, and had only seen the silent films of Charlie Chaplin, which gave me the impression that silent films were not the province of horror. 

   I didn't reckon on  "The Man of a Thousand Faces".


Other than the German version of the "Dracula"story by Bram Stoker,  "Nosfuatu" (1922) , no film of the silent era kept me awake like that ever again!   

Long years playing roles in theater had given Chaney the chance to perfect his skills as a master of  make-up techniques.  Many of the roles he played-a character without legs, or arms,  the famous hunchback of Medieval Paris, et al, --called for such physical demands on him that one wonders if he had a penchant for some sort of self-punishment. From Wikipedia: 

"Following the success of The Hunchback of Notre Dame in 1923, Chaney was once again given the freedom to create his own make-up as the Phantom, a habit which became almost as famous as the films he starred in. Chaney painted his eye sockets black, giving a skull-like impression to them. He also pulled the tip of his nose up and pinned it in place with wire, enlarged his nostrils with black paint, and put a set of jagged false teeth into his mouth to complete the ghastly deformed look of the Phantom. When audiences first saw The Phantom of the Opera, they were said to have screamed or fainted at the scene where Christine pulls the concealing mask away, revealing his skull-like features to the audience.

"Chaney's appearance as the Phantom in the film has been the most accurate depiction of the title character, based on the description given in the novel, where Erik the Phantom is described as having a skull-like face with a few wisps of black hair on top of his head. As in the novel, Chaney's Phantom has been deformed since birth, rather than having been disfigured by acid or fire, as in later adaptations of The Phantom of the Opera."

Chaney was a major  star in the 1920's and his films the one pictured above--the famous unmasking scene-- I considered quite shocking due to the frightening make-up he employed and the sense of gothic menace created by big studio cinematographers. 


Lon Chaney, the father of future Universal horror star Lon Chaney Junior--whose most memorable role was in several "Wolf Man" films--played a rich variety of roles.  A tough no-nonsense Marine in "Tell It To The Marines" (1927), a bone-tired and cynical detective in "While The City Sleeps" (1929) and a carnival hustler turned crook in "The Unholy Three" (1924).   That persona, of a tough guy who could also be noble, was similar to the star persona that Humphrey Bogart carried off two decades later. 


  But it was in his grotesque, expressionistic parts that he established his star power, a legend that was cut short near the end of the Silent Era with his death from lung cancer at age 46. He also played a Scotland Yard investigator  posing as a vampire to trap a killer in the now-lost "London After Midnight" (1927), perhaps the most sought-after missing feature  of the late silent era.  (A photo of the character he played is to the left.) 

The senior Chaney made it a point to be as invisible as possible  to the public between his roles on the screen.  He must have thought the less he spoke of himself, the more power his persona in whatever part he choose to play.   In a rare bit or relveation, he wrote of his work in a film magazine. 


 "I wanted to remind people that the lowest types of humanity may have within them the capacity for supreme self-sacrifice," Chaney wrote in Movie magazine. "The dwarfed, misshapen beggar of the streets may have the noblest ideals. Most of my roles since The Hunchback, such as The Phantom of the OperaHe Who Gets SlappedThe Unholy Three, etc., have carried the theme of self-sacrifice or renunciation. These are the stories which I wish to do."


 Chaney's parents were both deaf and so the pantomime acting required for silent films came to him very easy--he had been communicating with gestures and facial expressions all of his young life.      

It's conceded by most film historians I've read that Chaney would have likely starred in both the original "Dracula"  film as the Count and as the Monster in "Frankenstein", both made at his original studio, Universal. "Dracula" was directed by his freguent collaborator, Todd Browning.  

Instead those films made stars of Bela Lugosi and Boris Karloff.  Thanks to television revivals,  they became stars, and Karloff's career was as successful as Chaney's.  But for that vacuum of the loss of "The Man of A Thousand Faces", they might never have become household names in their own lifetimes.   


But thanks  to DVD releases and repackaging of silent films by The Criterion Collection and Kino Video,  this elder master of horror is getting some of his due back these days.  The movie viewers are the better I think for seeing what scared us then...and might   chill us still...

  


Tuesday, August 30, 2011

Forty Years of the Greatest Movies--Iggy Pop " The Passenger"




The Great Escape
Sunset Boulevard
(Repeated)
The Prince and the Pauper
The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
Flying Leathernecks
Pursued
Black Angel
Pickup on South Street
Fallen Angel
Giant
From Here to Eternity
His Girl Friday
Pursued
Lawrence of Arabia
The Great Escape
Big Jake
Rififi "this is the movie of the bleeding guy driving with the kid in the backseat. It's a French film noir and it's awesome."--CommanderPutney
Giant
Fallen Angel
The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
The Prince and the Pauper
From Here to Eternity
The Bad and the Beautiful
Pickup on South Street
Duel in the Sun
Top Hat
Stalag 17
Casablanca
Singin' In the Rain
Fallen Angel
The Wild Bunch
It Happened One Night
Black Angel
His Girl Friday
Murder My Sweet
Trouble In Paradise
Duel in the Sun
The Shop Around the Corner
Murder My Sweet
Pursued
Top Hat
From Here to Eternity
It Happened One Night
My Man Godfrey
The Fighting Seabees
Casablanca
Yankee Doodle Dandy
Some Like It Hot
Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid
Stalag 17
Citizen Kane
Destry Rides Again
Citizen Kane
Singin' In the Rain
Citizen Kane
Destry Rides Again
Duel in the Sun
The Thin Man
Force of Evil
Rio Bravo
Lawrence of Arabia
Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid
Take Me Out To the Ballgame
The Searchers
In the Navy
East of Eden
Robin and the Seven Hoods
The High and Mighty
In Old California
Giant
The Godfather
There's No Business Like Show Business
Top Hat
Rio Bravo
The Searchers

Not all great movies perhaps but some of the best the studio system ever made plus some great work by maverick directors like Sir David Lean, Sam Peckinpah and Jules Dassin. This will be provide a little finish off to the movie blogs I've done this month. Goodbye August. See you next year, and bring cooler weather.

A collage of film clips of some of the the best work by American and foreign film makers from 1930 to 1970, approx. Music by Igggy Pop and the Stooges. With thanks to Commander Putney of You Tube for the video and Aaran Aardvark for the inspiration.

Friday, July 15, 2011

M*A*S*H (1970) Director: Robert Altman/Elliot Gould, Donald Sutherland, Sally Kellerman

Rating:★★★★
Category:Movies
Genre: Classics
In 1970, in the face of the longest and likely craziest war in American history, a major studio in Hollywood bankrolled a movie where anarchy reigned and good guys blew the whistle on the whole charade of blind patriotism and the little turf wars of some generals and back-home politicians who saw war-making as a football game.

M*A*S*H* was perhaps not the first movie to let this mangy cat out of the bag, but it was the most successful and the first to totally hit home with a shell-shocked public tired of being lied to about Vietnam. The film grossed 80 million dollars, made more money then the standard World War II films of that same year ("Patton" and "Tora, Tora, Tora") and, along with "Easy Rider" and "The Graduate" , changed the way movies were made in America.
This period wouldn't last long before the space cowboys from far, far away and the Rambo movies would wave the flag without question again. But it left a mark we still see in movies now and again.
It's pretty funny too.



The film was episodic-television and B-feature film director Robert Altman's breakout movie. In this case, to say this is the director's film is literally more true than usual. Although he had a very good script by a former black-listed writer, Ring Lardner, Jr., from a novel by a couple Korean War vets, Altman also had his own ideas about war. He had flown 53 bombing missions as a co-pilot in the South Pacific during World War II and had his share of disillusionment about the costs of war. "M*A*S*H* is movie about insanity," he was quoted as saying. He essentially redesigned Lardner's script so much the writer thought the film was ruined. The studio heads at 20th Century Fox were scared too, until the movie was premiered in San Francisco early in 1970 and they discovered the audience totally got it. They were ahead of the honchos. The film opened in New York, won the Grand Prize at the Cannes Film Festival that year and so on.

Although Robert Altman is famous with cinemaphiles for going against traditional three-act narrative story-telling, the film has some precedent I believe in the Marx Brothers movies of the 1930's. In films like "Duck Soup" (1933), Groucho Marx is some how made President or a country or in "Horse Feathers" he is a college president.


Because of this "happy idea", going back to the plays of Aristophanes, authority is essentially suspended; protocol goes by the wayside; men of high station and stuffed shirts are brought down to size by witty insults they have no comebacks to; grand women of great pretense are shown they are silly people who need to smarten up, leaders in institutions grown moss-backed by their undisputed deference by others are given the boot. Anarchy reigns. The big shots have made a hash of the world through war and depressions; its time to let the competent smart alacks. the Lords of Misrule, in to being human behavior back down to earth. Wine and beer is spilled; merriment is had between the sexes, fools are no longer suffered, people sing into the night and all is merry again

Again, as in those funny films from the dark days of The Great Depression we are presented with a character(s) in a position of authority through some happenstance, like being drafted.

In this case, the "big idea" is that two top-flight surgeons are drafted into the Army Medical Corps. Since the business of "meatball" surgery", patching up soldiers and Marines from ghastly wounds, is booming business, they are nearly indispensable. They do not let this leverage go untested.

The film has its flaws in my view. The famous "naked woman surprised in the shower" scene with Sally Kellerman plays like a misogynist fantasy. The character of "Hot Lips" isn't just put down; she has to be humiliated. Some critics see this as the director commenting on the bad behavior of men in a war zone. Perhaps, but it's a scene that says more to me about the director than any war, Korea or Vietnam, he might be commenting on.

In any case the merriment always ends when the wounded men come from the front lines to be patched up to fight on or go home, half-alive or in a coffin. In that way the film is of a darker hue than anything the Brothers Marx were allowed to get away with. "M*A*S*H* does an excellent job balancing the true cost of war with the facade of bull that tries to cover up those costs in colorful bunting and empty words. War is human folly, and sometimes the only way to show it clearly to "the folks back home" is to make it as zany and as bloody as possible at the same time.



Saturday, December 11, 2010

Visions of Shakespeare's "Othello"

(below,  the great American actor Paul Robeson and Peggy Ashcroft in a scene from the London, 1930 production of Othello in London.) 

 

 

"Othello" was likely written by Shakespeare sometime around 1604, at least that is when it was recorded as being first performed.  It is taken from a short story by an Italian writer named Giraldi Cinthio, but seems considerably improved by the playwright based on the available English version, which is rather a rambling and disjointed tale.  A friend of mine who has studied Italian literature called the story a "hack job".

Shakespeare's "Othello" is direct and precise by contrast---we see a story set in Venice and later in Cyprus of a great general who is a Moor and a converted Christian who does great service to the Venetian Republic.  Despite his great travails of a life in exotic places and in countless battles,  he is taken in by Iago, a villain of rare power who seemingly  is willing to destroy all those around Othello and then himself and will do anything and use anyone--even his own wife, Emilia--to set the course of this evil plot involving a misplaced handkerchief, invidious gossip,  false and misleading interpretations of simple chivalrous gestures, and literal back-stabbing of his fellow officers.

Iago knows the weaknesses of all those around him, and yet no one suspects him until they are wounded or wronged beyond measure.    

What drives Iago? Is it just because he is an ensign and is past up for promotion to lieutenant by a younger man, Cassio? It hardly seems enough of a reason to justify the deviousness and malice in the way Iago takes advantage of Othello's trust and twists him into a terrible crime.  

A lot of theories are out there about this--racism, sexual attraction to either Desdemona or maybe Othello himself, but Shakespeare doesn't seem to me to be too worried about any specific reason.  Othello is a great man with a gaping blind spot for the virtue of his new wife,  and so his fall will be pitied because it is from such a height  that the falls, and that, unlike, say, Hamlet who doubts everybody, the Moor's inherent trust in Iago is so abused.  

I wondered when I last read this play if Iago is,simply,  evil for the sake of being evil. This makes the play perhaps the most modern of the great tragedies of Shakespeare--we live in a world where sociopaths and serial killers haunt our media.  Like the scorpion in Franz Kafka's  fable from "The Trial" about the reptile killing a frog while on his back in the middle of a stream, even though the scorpion himself will die. It is just Iago's nature and no explanation therefore could be seen as having a purpose.  How else, perhaps,  to explain the speech here by Kenneth Branagh in a 1995 version of the play:   

 

Here is from the Third Scene of the First Act, where Othello speaks to the Venetian Senate and his new father-in-law, Brabentio, a worthy of the city, on how he and the older man's daughter were secretly wed.  This is from Orson Welles' 1952 version, and it also my favorite speech in the play.          

 

Tuesday, March 23, 2010

Ennio Morricone "The Ecstasy of Gold" from "The Good, the Bad and the Ugly"




This haunting piece of music comes near the end of Sergio Leone's classic 1966 Western. In the film, the "Bad" character Tuco (Eli Wallach) races through a vast desert graveyard of wooden crosses, attempting to find the one marked "Arch Stanton", whose coffin is supposed to contain a cache of gold. Hot on his heels are Clint Eastwood and Lee Van Cleef (the Good and the Bad, respectively).

This is a recent orchestration conducted by Maestro Morricone himself, with Susanna Rigacci as the soloist.

The graveyard was created by the Spanish Army on loan to Leone and company for the shooting of the film. They also blew up a bridge for the cameras during a scene depicting an epic American Civil War battle.

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

"Close Encounters of the Third Kind" (1977)




This film came out the same year as George Lucas' magnum box-office hit, "Star Wars" (the popcorn-popular "Avatar" of its day) and, although this was hardly a "sleeper", this film encompasses a more subtle and spiritual theme about humankind and the dream of finding someone to communicate with over a vast universe than the more famous saga of Darth Vader and a certain Skywalker clan.

Richard Dreyfuss' character, Roy Neary, is a midwestern utility worker whose ordinary life is completely undone by a vision that drives him apart from his unbelieving wife and children and ultimately sends him out on a mission to understand a compulsion that is either a great discovery or a symptom of personal encroaching madness.

Luckily for him, a small group of other people totally unrelated to one another have this vision as well. A child has been kidnapped from his mother; fighter planes missing for thirty years suddenly reemerge in a desert hindreds of miles from their last reported position, in perfect working order. Thousands of people in India and China are experiencing visions that lead authorities to more questions than answers.

The US intelligence community and other international military and scientific groups are trying to keep a lid on these matters. Not knowing what to do with such a potential threat, governments mount a campaign of fear and secrecy to try and contain information. Fear of the Other is the crisis, not the aliens themselves.

This is a film with suspense and charged drama but, unlike most every science fiction film I had ever seen until this one, it presents extra-terrestrial life not as a "War of the Worlds" or "Star Wars" struggle of forces but as a scientific quest where life on other planets is not a conflict but a source of "contact" between beings no longer separated from the vacuum of space.

"Close Encounters of the Third Kind"

Directed by Steven Spielberg
Produced by Julia Phillips
Michael Phillips
Written by Steven Spielberg
Starring Richard Dreyfuss
François Truffaut
Melinda Dillon
Terri Garr
Music by John Williams
Cinematography Vilmos Zsigmond
Editing by Michael Kahn
Distributed by Columbia Pictures
Release date(s) November 16, 1977
Running time 135 minutes

Wednesday, July 22, 2009

Fellini's "La Dolce Vita"--The Sweet Life at 50

Sometimes you see a film that comes with a lot of critical acclaim and a heap of cultural baggage.  And you look at it and say to yourself or a friend, "I just don't get this movie.  Why did people make such a fuss about it when it came out?  Why do people reference it so often, what's so great about it?"

La Dolce Vita  (1960) is not one of those movies.  It's a movie that, with each viewing, pays off with new insights into the human condition. 


The basic plot is about a tabloid journalist named Marcello (played by Marcello Mastroianni  )    He is a man on a tightrope--trying to maintain a balance between covering the rich and successful "beautiful people" of high-flying Roman society and not being blown off his perch by the temptations such a life offers a handsome and vigorous man. He is not a Roman by birth; like Fellini himself, he comes from a provincial part of Italy and he is a product of an ordinary middle-class life. He also maintains a connection to high culture, represented by his friendship with the intellectual older man, Professor Steiner.

Marcello admires Steiner and his conventional life as a college professor, but is It the life he really wants to emulate?      

His reportage dwells on the intellectual void of jet-setting celebrities and aristocrats.    It is that life--the sweet life of a metropolitan, jet-setting party-hounds and the "paparazzi" that follow and prey on their foibles and tragedies --that draws Marcello further and further away from his real talents. His love of quick and fast sensations erode his dreams of achieving his serious goals.   

Here's one of the most famous scenes in the film--Marcello is out on a sort-of-date with a movie sex goddess, played by Anita Ekberg.  He is drawn to her, but she is in a world all her own.