
Rating: | ★★★★★ |
Category: | Books |
Genre: | Literature & Fiction |
Author: | F. Scott Fitzgerald |
This is a novel I find myself going back to every so often. I first read it at fifteen. I had seen the film with Robert Redford and Mia Farrow as Gatsby and Daisy Buchanan, respectively, two one-time sweethearts from the time of World War One who are reunited briefly and not coincidentally seven years or so later in an affluent part of the suburbs of New York City, along the green glades and postcard-pretty little private harbors and estates of Long Island.
The movie was okay. I didn't understand the hullaballo about it actually. Then I read the book on my own. It was like a light going on in my head. I could imagine how great the movie SHOULD have been but somehow wasn't.
Jay Gatsby is a war hero, a newly-rich provocative shadow of the Long Island party set, and an apparent shady background as to how he acquired his money. (I love how Fitzgerald slowly brings the reader details of the the real Jay Gatsby and slowly dis-spells the various legends about him that the guests at his lavish parties have of him.) Only one man gets to know the real man--Nick Carroway, the narrator of the book. At the end of Gatsby's life, he is also Jay's only friend.
Jay Gatz (his real last name) is trying to get back the one thing that money and medals and social popularity can't buy for him--the love of Daisy. She is married to the more patrician Tom Buchanan, a polo-playing former college football hero with decidedly backward views on race and snobbish views of social position. He is also a violent cad of the first water,and his own mistress is just a doormat to him, or she better behave that way if she knows what's good for her.
By the end of the book it is clear that Daisy has fallen in love again with Gatsby, who has bought an estate near hers and gives lavish parties for the sole reason perhaps of attracting her away from Tom and into his life. But is Daisy really in love enough to leave Tom for Jay? She says she is at one point in the novel, but I wonder...
In between Jay and Daisy--besides Tom--is Nick, a Middle Westerner (like Fitzgerald himself) who is Daisy's cousin and the one person who Gatsby trusts to arrange a private tea with her at Nick's bungalow. (Nick is no millionaire--he's a bond salesman on Wall Street in the heady pre-Depression stock market.)
Many critics have commented on the "tragedy" of Jay Gatsby. I'm not sure he really is a tragic character, but he is a romantic. I think this self-made man truly believes he can reassemble his past and get a second chance with the person he believes is his soul-mate. What he can't see---and what rereading this novel again recently shows to me, is that he is chasing after a mirage, a idealized view of his beloved that Daisy--or perhaps no woman--could ever hope to sustain as a real flesh-and-blood human being. There is a short passage where Nick sums it up:
"There must have been moments even that afternoon when Daisy tumbled short of his dreams--not through her own fault but because of the colossal vitality of his illusion. It had gone beyond her, beyond everything. He had thrown himself into it with a creative passion."
Scott Fitzgerald knew something about creative passions, and his own life took some near-tragic twists with alcohol, professional failure and his wife's madnes. But he was a great writer, and he proves it in his early short stories and in this novel. His dialogue here and in other works is always some of the best I've ever read. Those who have read this short novel even once probably already know that. It's one novel I'd take with me to a desert island. Perhaps you too have a similar feeling about a novel or a collected group of stories you'd like to share.
I probably did read at least one book since I was a book worm back then. But Scott Fitzgerald seemed like a failure to me even then due to what I knew of his private life. His wife I viewed as tragic.
ReplyDeleteAh, yes, The Great Gatsby a really good book. To think he wrote his first novel at the age of twenty four. If I remember rightly, that was "This Side of Paradise".
ReplyDeleteThe Great Gatsby, where he depicted the Jazz age perfectly, was a time with much glitter and a need to be seen having fun. I find that era in the 20's - 40's fascinating! What a shame his life became overshadowed by too much drink, debt and illnesses. Poor Zelda was permanently institutionalised, at a time when they locked you up and often threw away the key...
Yes, I could live with Scots Fitzgerald's novels on an Island. Right now a deserted Island and a good book seems just the ticket, eh Doug?
An interesting blog as usual. Thank you!
Cassandra
It must have seemed that way to him at the end of is life--professionally at least. None of his book were in print when he died in 1940, and he was having a hard time in Hollywood as a screenwriter. It was only in the late Fifties and after that his reputation was restored.
ReplyDeleteYes, I do , too, Cassandra. That era was both frightening and exciting for so many (sometimes at once)! Culturally America was coming into its own in plays and novels, and of course there was Hollywood.
ReplyDeleteSad about Zelda, and so many. Perhaps she was bipolar. Today, she would have been treated medically as an out-patient under drugs and therapy. Her life ended sadly in a fire. I guess they were quite a fun couple in the Jazz Age portion of their marriage. (Which makes the burnout in the early 30's all the more sad.)
"This Side of Paradise" is one I'm reading now. Long time since the last. It would be great to have a tropic climate to go with it ;-)
I haven`t read it yet. But I`ve just put it on my list. Recommended by the Great Noakesby
ReplyDeleteThanks for the superlative suffix , Jeff. The prose Fitzgerald wrote is a good match for writers you might be more familiar with, like E.M. Forster and Robert Graves.
ReplyDeleteI have never read the book nor seen the film Doug, so I am just going on what you have written here.Gatsby doesn't sound on the face of it a character I'd have much sympathy with, but you have whetted my appetite for the book on the basis of your review and recommendation. If I found myself marooned on a desert island I'd like to have Brave New World with me to re-read well away from where it all is happening.
ReplyDeleteThis was a wondeful book, as was the movie...
ReplyDeleteWonderful love story...
Glad I could intrigue you at least a little with "Gatsby", AA. Frankly, don't know how well Fitzgerald "travels" with readers in Britain, what his reputation might be with the non-critic who wants to learn about pre-Depression class arrogance and those who came to either upset the higher social ranks (or join them) after World War I ended.
ReplyDeleteYou have alot of great writers whose subjects include "class divisions" and up and down-ward mobility... Austen, for one, Dickens and Forster...perhaps F. Scott seems redundant.
Nobody can fault "Brave New World"--Huxley had incredible social foresight, the only thing is, as he acknowledged himself in the sequel set in the late 1950's, he probably set that dis-utopian classic some decades too far into the future.
I agree about the book. I think Redford and Farrow were perfect for their roles by the way. Something about the film in total never quite clicked for me--as much as I wanted it to after reading the book a couple times.. But I understand there could be another big screen version coming soon from Baz Luhrmann--who did "Moulin Rouge" so we shall see.
ReplyDelete