Welcome!

Thursday, July 30, 2009

The Cherokee Nation and the Trail of Tears

Rating:★★★★
Category:Books
Genre: History
Author:Theda Perdue, Michael Green
"The Indians have ceased to be an object of terror. The time seems to arrived when our policy toward them should undergo an important change... Our views of their interest, and not their own, ought to govern them."
--John C. Calhoun,
Secretary of War
Report to US House of Representatives, 1818.


This book tells of a tragedy for Native Americans. For centuries before British and later American settlement, the Cherokee people had settled in the Appalachian Mountains of what became part of the states of Georgia, North Carolina, Tennessee and Alabama. .

'The Cherokee Nation and the Trail of Tears" is the retelling of the the forced removal of thousands of native peoples from 1838--1842, a trek that took the out of their homeland to a more desolate location over one thousand miles across North America in what was then called "Indian Territory" (later the state of Oklahoma. A quarter of the Cherokee removed in a series of poorly planned and provisioned forced repatriations organized by the US Army and later by the native government died thanks to the policies of "Great White Fathers" in Washington like President Andrew Jackson and Calhoun, who went on to become Vice-President of the United States.
The Cherokee died from diseases like cholera, from the numbing cold, from hunger, and sometimes white-on-Indian violence, especially against those tried to resist or escape the forced removals.

When Calhoun spoke of determining the fate of the Native peoples in 1818, the American Government had triumphed in two wars and held their own against British forces in the Great Lakes area during the War of 1812. Some Indian tribes had formed ties with with the British, and the end of the war in 1815 ending British control below Lower Canada also gave American settlers a strong desire for revenge against the tribes.

The American forces had also defeated the great native alliance led by Shawnee leader Tecumseh in the Great Lakes country, and also emerged victorious over a branch of the Creek Indians known as "The Red Stick Faction" in the southern territories. Andrew Jackson, a man who despised all Indian peoples, was a general in the latter war and, ironically, some of those soldiers and scouts who helped him defeat the Red Stick Creek were Cherokee.

Despite this aid, Jackson never wavered in his desire to run the Cherokee off their land. A resident of Tennessee, "Old Hickory" represented the living embodiment of many Americans who were pushing by the hundreds of thousands into the Appalachians region and beyond to the Mississippi in the 1820's.

The push into the Southern territories was lead by the citizens of Georgia, who wanted the Cherokee land either for small farms or cotton plantations that would rely on the chattel labor of African-American slaves.

Professor Theda Perdue, co-author of the book, expanded on the power arrayed against the Cherokee in a 2003 interview for Public Broadcasting for a Program called "Race: The Power of An Illusion":

"And so the pressure to remove Indians from the Southeast, to push them off their ancestral lands, really is a double-pronged attack. It's an attack on the basis of: Indians have this land; they're not making the proper use of it; it needs to be farmed by whites who can put it to proper use. But also the idea that you have these independent people of color in the South, who are not fully subjugated because they're governed by their own tribal governments. And these people have to be brought to heel. These people have to be subjugated to this racial system.

"It was virtually impossible to subjugate them unless you did away with their nations. And of course that is what the state of Georgia did in the removal crisis. It simply declared the Cherokee government inoperative within the chartered bounds of Georgia. And Georgia law began to be enforced over Cherokees who lived within the state. And Georgia law was discriminatory. Cherokees were not the equals of whites in Georgia law. They could not testify against whites. And this meant that Cherokees were brought into that racial system. Georgians, of course, intended to make life so miserable for the Cherokees that they would agree to go west; that is, that they would surrender their land, which could then be opened to white settlement."


Other peoples threatened by this unbridled expansion policy included the Chickasaws, Choctaws, Creeks and Seminoles. All or most of these people would face deportation to Indian Territory at this time.


In 1830, a gold strike occurred on Cherokee land that was already being overrun by white settlers. This and Jackson's election to the Presidency in 1828, sealed the fate of a proud and ancient civilization with their own religion, writings, newspapers and businesses.

It is a sad and tragic story, fueled by greed for land and race-hatred. But the Cherokee Nation survives today with 300,000 citizens of the three main tribes, and hundreds of thousands of others with Cherokee ancestry, including the actors James Garner, Johnny Depp, James Earl Jones as well as entertainers like the late Johnny Cash, Billy Ray Cyrus and former President Bill Clinton.
Here's more background on Southeastern Indian Removal, from the recent Documentary "500 Nations":

19 comments:

  1. This so sounds like a book I want to read. What a terrible story and extra-horrible when we realise that similar stories have/are being enacted throughout our world. Its an odd quirk (not sure that quirk was quite the word I was seeking) of eurocentricity when on the one hand the lands they colonised they viewed as "empty" lands despite the fact that they then worked so hard to kill/destroy/remove the original inhabitants.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes, the notion of a "frontier" ideology is fed on the doctrine that there isn't any peoples of consequence in the way to the territorial advancement of a larger group.

    The Cherokee had their own culture, written language, newspapers, religious beliefs, et al. Many even assimilated into white society. But it became necessary to demonize these people, even though the leaders did give some land to whites and mainly were content to be left alone with what was a rather small part of "the frontier".

    Thanks for your comments, Iri Ani.

    ReplyDelete
  3. A long overdue book.

    Being distantly related to Stand Watie, I've always taken an interest in this rather tawdry part of American history -- while we need to realize that what was done was 'normal' in the context of the time, it was also an atrocity.

    As a people, humans are really not much more civil toward each other now than then. The 20th is full of examples; so is the first part of the 21st.

    Civilization is a thin veneer, indeed.

    ReplyDelete
  4. As the late writer/filmmaker Billy Wilder once wrote. "What's so great about the 20th Century? Put all the other centuries on slips of paper into a hat, and I'll bey you can pull out a better one."

    True, Astra. The fact that it was "normal" for the majority of white Americans to think this was okay is scary. I was somewhat heartened by how close the vote was in Congress to evict the Cherokee--a five-vote margin--but Jackson defied the Supreme Court and I;m sure he would have defied a bare majority in Congress. Anyway, the native peoples had no voice.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Jackson, in spite of being on the $20, is my least-favorite president.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Living in Colorado all those years I have been made well aware of the 'Trail of Tears', as it went right through Colorado territory as well. What can we say? Our history is often shockingly cruel. Can we learn from it?

    ReplyDelete
  7. This was a dark day in American history. The way we mistreated the Native American population. We stole their lands, mistreated them when they were on the reservation and tried to destroy their culture by taking their children away from them and sending them away to be educated,

    ReplyDelete
  8. Ditto to that. If Jackson came back to life, I'd probably say. "Hi Andy. Welcome back. Make yourself at home and hang somebody."


    His monetary policies--he was allergic to National banks--helped land the economy in "The Panic (severe recession) of 1837". Kind of like some other more recent President I predict won't even make it to the $10,000 bill.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Yes,I believe we do, Red. We learn all too slowly for the generations following those we savaged from the past though.

    ReplyDelete
  10. All too true, and all too ugly, Fred. These draconian policies and "solutions" seem odd for a nation founded on the Enlightenment Idea of all being equal in the eyes of the law. Some knew it even back then that it was immoral to harm people like this. Just not enough.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Actions speak louder than words.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Only if you were a white Protestant male.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Yes, sadly all too true, Fred. It took a Civil War and 600,000 lives just to create the conditions to free hundreds of thousands from slavery, never mind their equality, although that was tried--and failed--by the end of The Reconstruction Era (1865-1877) as you already know.

    ReplyDelete
  14. This may be a classic case of that phrase,Iri Ani.

    Men like Andrew Jackson and the other white land speculators mainly from the state of Georgia controlled the action. Even when the Chief Justice John Marshall of the United States Court--technically an equal branch of the tripartite government of the nation-- told the state of Georgia in a 1830 case hat they would have to abide by the Federal laws that then recognized the Cherokee Nation, Jackson simply said "The Chief Justice has made his ruling. Now let him try to enforce it!"

    ReplyDelete
  15. Thanks for posting your review of this fascinating book Doug. My book list gets longer everyday and so I have to rely on friends blogs to inform me on so many important and interesting things, this blog is one such example.
    The video is also a great account of the evolution of both the new world and in a sense the old world too.

    Much of this story is still being played out I think in Africa where mass removals still take place and in Palestine of course.

    America is the laboratory for modernity, the place where some of the ideas of the modern world spread their wings and have flourished at the cost of the native peoples who lived there before the experiment took off.

    This same ruthless racist policies are alive and well today and living in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iraq...the idea that you can just heave whole societies aside if they stand in the way of your own personal enrichment.

    America has gone global, first it sucked in all the technologies of Europe and then in a great gasp of self reliance... it blew out all the ideologies of the west, colonialism, racism, gunboat diplomacy the whole imperial tool box.

    America has not only gone global it's gone cosmic even the universe itself now belongs to the big shots that created and now run 'big shot' USA it seems.

    And this was the start of it all, it had happened before of course but this was the start of regime change on an industrial scale with the technologies to overwhelm traditional cultures and dispossess them.

    Nothing has changed much except the location.

    Thanks for your insights into American history and it's central role in the wider history of modernity Doug.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Thanks for posting your review of this fascinating book Doug. My book list gets longer everyday and so I have to rely on friends blogs to inform me on so many important and interesting things, this blog is one such example.
    The video is also a great account of the evolution of both the new world and in a sense the old world too.

    Much of this story is still being played out I think in Africa where mass removals still take place and in Palestine of course.

    America is the laboratory for modernity, the place where some of the ideas of the modern world spread their wings and have flourished at the cost of the native peoples who lived there before the experiment took off.
    This same ruthless racist policies are alive and well today and living in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iraq...the idea that you can just heave whole societies aside if they stand in the way of your own personal enrichment.

    America has gone global, first it sucked in all the technologies of Europe and then in a great gasp of self reliance... it blew out all the ideologies of the west, colonialism, racism, gunboat diplomacy the whole imperial tool box.

    America has not only gone global it's gone cosmic even the universe itself now belongs to the big shots that created and now run 'big shot' USA it seems.

    And this was the start of it all, it had happened before of course but this was the start regime change on an industrial scale with the technologies to overwhelm traditional cultures and dispossess them.

    Nothing has changed much except the location.

    Thanks for your insights into American history and it's role in the wider history of modernity Doug.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Excellent analysis, AA.

    It strikes me that one of the differences in the outcome of European and American imperialism is that the Europeans expanded into India, Africa and the ports of China as the result of modern weaponry and superior numbers. After World War II the Colonial powers gradually receded. Efforts to create a Euro-African business and land-owning class in places like Kenya and Algeria stalled in wars that brought independence. At the time this book covers, United States retained her "colonial possessions", incorporating territories that, as you point out, heaved aside whole peoples.

    American leaders of the 1950's thought they were immune from being kicked out of anywhere they asserted enough power in... until the Vietnam War awoke them from the tragedy of American Exceptional-ism. During that war, and others before it, any ground held by enemies units was considered "Indian country", a left-hand tribute to the nation's "glorious" wars against those "First Peoples" who by treaty or force followed the Cherokee into desolate reservations, and total cultural debasement.

    This end of Yank Exceptional-ism has been a bitter pill for many to swallow and, as we have seen recently, still cannot be accepted by the Neo-Cons.

    Excellent points AA. Thanks for your comments.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Thanks for that Doug. I think American Exceptionalism accounts for why that empire arose, but every imperial nation has always painted itself as something 'special' in one way or another. The British empire was based upon race and class prejudices that put the white Raj at the top of the pecking order for a while, the Anglo-American empire has inherited many of those characteristics I think.

    It is, it seems to me, an English speaking empire with a shifting locus of power and it is united as one across the entire global Anglosphere.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Good points. Race and class prejudices are indeed not exceptional to Americans, AA, nor to other English-speaking peoples.
    I think these shifts you speak of preserved a hegemony that survived the Cold War, but, in attempts to maintain cheap fuel commodities by supporting corrupt sheiks and shahs, sowed the seeds of a Islamist-based resentment that has given this moveable empire no real respite from the old days of Soviet-NATO loggerheads. The ultimate winner of all this might be China, but I'm frankly none too sure given the lost fortunes of other would-be powers like Japan and the EU.

    ReplyDelete